Chad M Stewart wrote:
And if you'd pre-ordered 3.8 then you might have gotten an email like I
did today. :-) Now I just need enough revenue from my new company so I
can replace all of my "servers" with real boxes like V20z and X4100.
Funny now that I'm now longer an employee of Sun I'll p
On Oct 21, 2005, at 2:16 PM, Sebastian Cufre wrote:
Well, the problem is that with OpenBSD 3.7 other thing doesn't work
(php4-xslt makes apache crash when used), and OpenBSD 3.8 is no yet
released
officially.
And if you'd pre-ordered 3.8 then you might have gotten an email like
I did tod
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 03:16:13PM -0300, Sebastian Cufre wrote:
> Well, the problem is that with OpenBSD 3.7 other thing doesn't work
> (php4-xslt makes apache crash when used), and OpenBSD 3.8 is no yet released
> officially.
>
> On 10/21/05, Peter Valchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I
Well, the problem is that with OpenBSD 3.7 other thing doesn't work
(php4-xslt makes apache crash when used), and OpenBSD 3.8 is no yet released
officially.
On 10/21/05, Peter Valchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have a simple c++ program that throws an exception and tries to catch
> it.
> >
> I have a simple c++ program that throws an exception and tries to catch it.
> But when I run it, it crashes with segmentation faul. Looking and the stack
> trace, looks like the exception is thrown but no one catches it. Is this a
> bug? There's a workaround?
Not sure when, but this has been fix
I have a simple c++ program that throws an exception and tries to catch it.
But when I run it, it crashes with segmentation faul. Looking and the stack
trace, looks like the exception is thrown but no one catches it. Is this a
bug? There's a workaround?
The c++ file is:
---
include
int main(void
6 matches
Mail list logo
