Re: Don't read this - OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure | BSD, the truth - as author rewrites your comments and can't spell

2013-08-12 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 17:51:43 +0100 Kaya Saman wrote: I think it's much harder to learn since the documentation is more 'sparse' and also much more limited in certain areas kernel PPP daemon for example :-) - it took me a while to figure out how to get PPPoE working. Well I agree and

Don't read this - OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure | BSD, the truth - as author rewrites your comments and can't spell

2013-08-10 Thread Kevin Chadwick
While searching for 'OpenBSD bad package CONTENTS' I somehow came across this and got sucked in when I shouldn't have. OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure | BSD, the truth http://aboutthebsds{dot}wordpress{dot}com Well I had a go at educating the author of this thread but I

Re: Don't read this - OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure | BSD, the truth - as author rewrites your comments and can't spell

2013-08-10 Thread ag@gmail
I doubt if anyone on this list will believe that it was actually you who posted it in its current form. Besides, thanks for passing it along - it is an excellent light reading over a weekend - tickled me to death! -ag -- sent via 100% recycled electrons from my mobile command center. On Aug

Re: Don't read this - OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure | BSD, the truth - as author rewrites your comments and can't spell

2013-08-10 Thread Michał Markowski
OpenBSD’s PF: A stripped down copy of IPTABLES made my day. :) -- Michał Markowski