On 9/13/06, Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bofh wrote:
On 9/13/06, Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I never said it was secure. In fact, I distinctly recall saying
hell no to whether or not I considered phpBB secure. What I
*did* say was that it fit my needs, as I laid them
Hi bofh,
You about Chris:
Then I profess I do not understand why you get so pissed off when Adam
pointed out that phpbb is not good, since apparently you don't consider
it to be good by your own standards.
I think what Chris was getting all worked up about, was the fact that
Adam chose to
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 03:04:09AM +0200, Robert Urban wrote:
if you want to be taken seriously,
Who is going to pay any attention to a top poster
maybe you should change your
e-mail address to something that isn't offensive to everyone who
receives your e-mails, in this case,
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 21:49, Don Koch wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:39:53 +
Deanna Phillips wrote:
Michael Schmidt writes:
which experiences or what knowledge are/is available
concerning good and secure forum-software known to run under
OpenBSD? I am interested in
Take a look at www.mybboard.com
- Original Message -
From: Michael Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 8:13 AM
Subject: Forum-Software, good and secure, on OpenBSD systems?
Hello,
which experiences or what knowledge are/is available
Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He said good and secure. Phpbb is neither.
Perhaps you would like to offer an alternative
Nope.
instead of just dissing the phpBB users?
I didn't say anything about any users.
Your definition of good is probably different, and phpBB might not
meet
I don't think I want to use the words good and secure, however PunBB
with SQLite works well for a friend's site. It's probably not quite
as woeful as PhpBB from a security standpoint, but it still uses PHP.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:13:23PM +0200, Michael Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
which
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 14:35, Marcos Laufer wrote:
Take a look at www.mybboard.com
The license contains the following gem:
The MyBB Group may alter or modify this license agreement without
notification and any changes made to the EULA will affect all past and
current copies of MyBB.
Adam wrote:
Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He said good and secure. Phpbb is neither.
Perhaps you would like to offer an alternative
Nope.
Then you are a useless troll. This will be my last reply to your filth.
instead of just dissing the phpBB users?
I
On 9/13/06, Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam wrote:
Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He said good and secure. Phpbb is neither.
Perhaps you would like to offer an alternative
Nope.
Then you are a useless troll. This will be my last reply to your filth.
Why is
Original message
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:43:19 -0500
From: bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [spam] Re: Forum-Software, good and secure, on OpenBSD systems?
To: Open BSD misc@openbsd.org
On 9/13/06, Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam wrote:
Chris Zakelj [EMAIL
bofh wrote:
Why is that a troll? He offered an opinion on Phpbb. It is neither good
nor secure. [see below] Just because he cannot offer an alternative (there
may not be a secure alternative even!)
Because that sentiment had already been echoed by others. No sense
beating dead horses
Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam wrote:
Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He said good and secure. Phpbb is neither.
Perhaps you would like to offer an alternative
Nope.
Then you are a useless troll.
Or maybe I just don't happen to have an
if you want to be taken seriously, maybe you should change your
e-mail address to something that isn't offensive to everyone who
receives your e-mails, in this case, several thousand people.
You're just asking to be misunderstood. People misunderstand, and you
wonder why.
why don't you grow up?
Robert Urban [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you want to be taken seriously, maybe you should change your
e-mail address to something that isn't offensive to everyone who
receives your e-mails, in this case, several thousand people.
I am glad to offend the people who find it offensive.
You're
On 9/13/06, Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bofh wrote:
Bad comparison. MSFT's patches are across an entire product line. You
are
talking about one specific product here. In order to get a valid
comparison, you will have to count patches for a product of similar size
and
bofh wrote:
On 9/13/06, Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I never said it was secure. In fact, I distinctly recall saying
hell no to whether or not I considered phpBB secure. What I
*did* say was that it fit my needs, as I laid them out.
Which is good to you, but probably isn't good to
Hello,
which experiences or what knowledge are/is available concerning good and
secure forum-software known to run under OpenBSD?
I am interested in feedback on this.
Michael
--
Michael Schmidt MIRRORS:
DJGPP ftp://ftp.fh-koblenz.de/pub/DJGPP/
Ghostscript
On 9/12/06, Michael Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
which experiences or what knowledge are/is available concerning good and
secure forum-software known to run under OpenBSD?
I am interested in feedback on this.
I have been using punbb (punbb.org) for the last few months with out
much
http://www.phpbb.com/
I've installed this on OBSD and it runs just fine, including chroot
and all.
On Sep 12, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Ste Jones wrote:
On 9/12/06, Michael Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
which experiences or what knowledge are/is available concerning
good and
secure
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 11:45:35AM -0600, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
http://www.phpbb.com/
I've installed this on OBSD and it runs just fine, including chroot
and all.
On Sep 12, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Ste Jones wrote:
On 9/12/06, Michael Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
which
Jack J. Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.phpbb.com/
He said good and secure. Phpbb is neither.
Adam
On Sep 12, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
phpBB isn't really well known for being secure. I'll throw simple
machines forum in the mix.
You're probably right. However, the only problem I've had is bots
creating
themselves accounts and posting ads for Xanax!
--
Jack J. Woehr
Director
Adam wrote:
Jack J. Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.phpbb.com/
He said good and secure. Phpbb is neither.
Perhaps you would like to offer an alternative instead of just dissing
the phpBB users? I've also had an acceptable record with phpBB. This
being the result of:
1.
On 2006/09/12 13:13, Michael Schmidt wrote:
which experiences or what knowledge are/is available concerning good and
secure forum-software known to run under OpenBSD?
I am interested in feedback on this.
undeadly.org? source code is available.
Michael Schmidt writes:
which experiences or what knowledge are/is available
concerning good and secure forum-software known to run under
OpenBSD? I am interested in feedback on this.
What about drupal? It's probably way more than you need for
just a forum, but it does look nice.
info :
26 matches
Mail list logo