Google in shell - looks interesting

2008-06-04 Thread Tomas Bodzar
http://goosh.org

Re: Google in shell - looks interesting

2008-06-04 Thread Cesare Gargano
On 04/06/08 13:39 +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote: http://goosh.org Great.

Re: Google in shell - looks interesting

2008-06-04 Thread Marti Martinez
Meh. Doesn't work with lynx. Why bother? On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Cesare Gargano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 04/06/08 13:39 +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote: http://goosh.org Great. -- Systems Programmer, Principal Electrical Computer Engineering The University of Arizona [EMAIL

Re: Google in shell - looks interesting

2008-06-04 Thread Cesare Gargano
On 04/06/08 07:59 -0700, Marti Martinez wrote: Meh. Doesn't work with lynx. Why bother? On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Cesare Gargano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 04/06/08 13:39 +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote: http://goosh.org Great. -- Systems Programmer, Principal

Re: Google in shell - looks interesting

2008-06-04 Thread William Bulley
According to Marti Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Meh. Doesn't work with lynx. Why bother? On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Cesare Gargano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 04/06/08 13:39 +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote: http://goosh.org Great. Doesn't work with links either. Plus in FireFox

Re: Google in shell - looks interesting

2008-06-04 Thread Jason Beaudoin
2008/6/4 Tomas Bodzar [EMAIL PROTECTED]: http://goosh.org while borderline useless in some respects, it's a tremendously interesting concept. :D thanks! (sorry Marti for that last message..) -- IEEE Student Branch President Wentworth Institute of Technology 550 Huntington Ave. Boston, MA.

Re: Google in shell - looks interesting

2008-06-04 Thread Marco Peereboom
And what are the colorblind doing with it? On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 11:09:32AM -0400, William Bulley wrote: According to Marti Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Meh. Doesn't work with lynx. Why bother? On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Cesare Gargano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 04/06/08

Re: Google in shell - looks interesting

2008-06-04 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008-06-04, William Bulley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: According to Marti Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Meh. Doesn't work with lynx. Why bother? On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Cesare Gargano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 04/06/08 13:39 +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote: http://goosh.org

Re: Google in shell - looks interesting

2008-06-04 Thread Ted Unangst
If it were actually usable from a shell, it'd be interesting. If I'm already running a graphical interbrowser, it's because I want graphical interwebs.

Re: Google in shell - looks interesting

2008-06-04 Thread Dag Richards
Ted Unangst wrote: If it were actually usable from a shell, it'd be interesting. If I'm already running a graphical interbrowser, it's because I want graphical interwebs. Exactly.

Re: Google in shell - looks interesting

2008-06-04 Thread Mark Zimmerman
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 09:46:26AM -0700, Dag Richards wrote: Ted Unangst wrote: If it were actually usable from a shell, it'd be interesting. If I'm already running a graphical interbrowser, it's because I want graphical interwebs. Exactly. So, can you launch a graphical browser

Re: Google in shell - looks interesting

2008-06-04 Thread Dag Richards
Mark Zimmerman wrote: On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 09:46:26AM -0700, Dag Richards wrote: Ted Unangst wrote: If it were actually usable from a shell, it'd be interesting. If I'm already running a graphical interbrowser, it's because I want graphical interwebs. Exactly. So, can you launch a