http://goosh.org
On 04/06/08 13:39 +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
http://goosh.org
Great.
Meh. Doesn't work with lynx. Why bother?
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Cesare Gargano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/06/08 13:39 +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
http://goosh.org
Great.
--
Systems Programmer, Principal
Electrical Computer Engineering
The University of Arizona
[EMAIL
On 04/06/08 07:59 -0700, Marti Martinez wrote:
Meh. Doesn't work with lynx. Why bother?
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Cesare Gargano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/06/08 13:39 +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
http://goosh.org
Great.
--
Systems Programmer, Principal
According to Marti Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Meh. Doesn't work with lynx. Why bother?
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Cesare Gargano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/06/08 13:39 +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
http://goosh.org
Great.
Doesn't work with links either. Plus in FireFox
2008/6/4 Tomas Bodzar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://goosh.org
while borderline useless in some respects, it's a tremendously
interesting concept.
:D
thanks!
(sorry Marti for that last message..)
--
IEEE Student Branch President
Wentworth Institute of Technology
550 Huntington Ave.
Boston, MA.
And what are the colorblind doing with it?
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 11:09:32AM -0400, William Bulley wrote:
According to Marti Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Meh. Doesn't work with lynx. Why bother?
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Cesare Gargano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/06/08
On 2008-06-04, William Bulley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to Marti Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Meh. Doesn't work with lynx. Why bother?
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Cesare Gargano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/06/08 13:39 +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
http://goosh.org
If it were actually usable from a shell, it'd be interesting. If I'm
already running a graphical interbrowser, it's because I want
graphical interwebs.
Ted Unangst wrote:
If it were actually usable from a shell, it'd be interesting. If I'm
already running a graphical interbrowser, it's because I want
graphical interwebs.
Exactly.
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 09:46:26AM -0700, Dag Richards wrote:
Ted Unangst wrote:
If it were actually usable from a shell, it'd be interesting. If I'm
already running a graphical interbrowser, it's because I want
graphical interwebs.
Exactly.
So, can you launch a graphical browser
Mark Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 09:46:26AM -0700, Dag Richards wrote:
Ted Unangst wrote:
If it were actually usable from a shell, it'd be interesting. If I'm
already running a graphical interbrowser, it's because I want
graphical interwebs.
Exactly.
So, can you launch a
12 matches
Mail list logo