Hello!
I want to say that this thread seems related with this one:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=117027330031702w=2
Two very different computer architectures (a i386-compatible embedded
computer running a 200 MHz Geode processor and a high-end sparc64 computer)
but both with a
Well, it seems that the problem related with the V210 system
is a consequence of a lack of documentation provided by Sun
Microsystems. pciide works fine on other sparc64 systems.
As the Geode computers are not designed with I/O performance
in mind, it makes sense thinking on the processor as the
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 08:50:53AM +0100, Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
attaching the drive to a notebook via a IDE/USB converter easily yields
20 MB/s. So the drive *is* faster. While i could live with 8 MB/s i
cannot accept the high CPU usage. It seems to make the installed crypto
accelerator
Hi list,
on my Soekris 4801-60 i have a FUJITSU MHV2120AT running as slave. The
performance is poor:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [/data] # time dd if=100Mb.dat of=/dev/null
204800+0 records in
204800+0 records out
104857600 bytes transferred in 11.980 secs (8752083 bytes/sec)
real0m12.042s
user
Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
on my Soekris 4801-60 i have a FUJITSU MHV2120AT running as slave. The
snip
104857600 bytes transferred in 11.980 secs (8752083 bytes/sec)
8MB/sec isn't particularly bad for a notebook drive, and I get very
similar numbers on my own 4801-60 w/ Samsung MP0402H drive:
wd0
Szentivanyi Matyas wrote:
Hi Heinrich!
I think it's almost the best speed you can achieve from the device. I've
got the same type of Soekris with a SAMSUNG HM080HC HDD (which is the
slave).
This HDD supports perpendicular recording
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpendicular_recording).
6 matches
Mail list logo
