On 7/24/06, Xavier Mertens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's still running 3.5 (ok, ok, don't shoot, it's an old one but upgrades are
not easy).
As another poster already mentioned: upgrades are an easy and well
documented process. Do your specific circumstances (e.g. problems to
physically
Ian Watts wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:10:53 +0200 (CEST)
Xavier Mertens [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
Hi Gurus,
I'm facing a strange and frustrating problem...
I run a box with OpenBSD without problem for a while (2 years).
It's still running 3.5 (ok, ok, don't shoot, it's an old one but
Ian Watts wrote:
It's still running 3.5 (ok, ok, don't shoot, it's an old one but
upgrades are not easy). It's an i386 1U in a safe environment (colo)
They are. That's exactly one of the main reasons why I have started
using OpenBSD at our Institute. Twice a year I spend ~ 2 hours (that
Hi Gurus,
I'm facing a strange and frustrating problem...
I run a box with OpenBSD without problem for a while (2 years).
It's still running 3.5 (ok, ok, don't shoot, it's an old one but upgrades are
not easy). It's an i386 1U in a safe environment (colo)
See attached dmesg below.
For two weeks
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:10:53 +0200 (CEST)
Xavier Mertens [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
Hi Gurus,
I'm facing a strange and frustrating problem...
I run a box with OpenBSD without problem for a while (2 years).
It's still running 3.5 (ok, ok, don't shoot, it's an old one but upgrades are
not
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:10:53 +0200 (CEST)
Xavier Mertens [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
Hi Gurus,
I'm facing a strange and frustrating problem...
I run a box with OpenBSD without problem for a while (2 years).
It's still running 3.5 (ok, ok, don't shoot, it's an old one but upgrades are
not easy).
6 matches
Mail list logo
