On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 06:56:16AM -0500, Donald Allen wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Tinker wrote:
>
> > Did two tests, one with async and one with softdep, on amd64, 5.9-CURRENT,
> > UFS.
> >
> > (Checked "dd"'s sources and there is no fsync() anywhere in
On 2016-02-14 19:20, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 06:56:16AM -0500, Donald Allen wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Tinker wrote:
> Did two tests, one with async and one with softdep, on amd64, 5.9-CURRENT,
> UFS.
>
> (Checked "dd"'s sources and
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Tinker wrote:
> Did two tests, one with async and one with softdep, on amd64, 5.9-CURRENT,
> UFS.
>
> (Checked "dd"'s sources and there is no fsync() anywhere in there.
>
> The bufcache setting was 90, 3GB free RAM, pushed 2GB of data using
Hi,
How much of my file writing, and filesystem operations such as creating
a new file/directory, will land in OpenBSD's disk/write cache without
touching the disk before return of the respective operation to my
program, for softdep or async UFS media and I never fsync() ?
This is relevant
Did two tests, one with async and one with softdep, on amd64,
5.9-CURRENT, UFS.
(Checked "dd"'s sources and there is no fsync() anywhere in there.
The bufcache setting was 90, 3GB free RAM, pushed 2GB of data using "dd"
to disk.
It took 12 and 15 seconds respectively, which is the
5 matches
Mail list logo