On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:50:41AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 05:43:06AM +, John Long wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 09:48:44PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
> > > On 02/23/16 14:42, John Long wrote:
> > > > Is there any ru
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 05:43:06AM +, John Long wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 09:48:44PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
> > On 02/23/16 14:42, John Long wrote:
> > > Is there any rule of thumb as to how full an ffs filesystem can be without
> > > impacting perf
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 09:48:44PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
> On 02/23/16 14:42, John Long wrote:
> > Is there any rule of thumb as to how full an ffs filesystem can be without
> > impacting performance or integrity issues?
>
> The people who wrote the code set the lim
On 02/23/16 14:42, John Long wrote:
> Is there any rule of thumb as to how full an ffs filesystem can be without
> impacting performance or integrity issues?
The people who wrote the code set the limit at 95%...so if you are
looking for a "Rule of Thumb"...that's it, provided b
Is there any rule of thumb as to how full an ffs filesystem can be without
impacting performance or integrity issues?
Thanks,
/jl
--
ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) Powered by Lemote Fuloong
against HTML e-mail X Loongson MIPS and OpenBSD
and proprietary/ \http://www.mutt.org
5 matches
Mail list logo