On 2021-05-06, Luke Small wrote:
> I got it working. I have a pretty hefty amount of vether0 and
> vether0:network in my pf.conf that I changed to vport0 and vport0:network.
>
> That fixed every single thing!
>
> I somehow completely forgot about all the vether0 pf rules which isolates
> the the
I got it working. I have a pretty hefty amount of vether0 and
vether0:network in my pf.conf that I changed to vport0 and vport0:network.
That fixed every single thing!
I somehow completely forgot about all the vether0 pf rules which isolates
the the various local systems so VMs are isolated from
On 6 May at 04:04, Luke Small wrote:
> There seems to be ZERO examples of using veb/vport vs bridge/vether. I am
> running 6.9 now and I substituted the bridge0 usage in vm.conf and I copied
> the hostname.vether0 into hostname.vport0 and hostname.bridge0 uses vether0
> so I used vport0 in
On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 09:04:04PM -0500, Luke Small wrote:
> There seems to be ZERO examples of using veb/vport vs bridge/vether. I am
> running 6.9 now and I substituted the bridge0 usage in vm.conf and I copied
> the hostname.vether0 into hostname.vport0 and hostname.bridge0 uses vether0
> so I
There seems to be ZERO examples of using veb/vport vs bridge/vether. I am
running 6.9 now and I substituted the bridge0 usage in vm.conf and I copied
the hostname.vether0 into hostname.vport0 and hostname.bridge0 uses vether0
so I used vport0 in hostname.veb0 . I used ifconfig … down for bridge0
5 matches
Mail list logo
