On 2008-03-25, Jon Radel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Meanwhile, I believe that Google has promised that this time they'll
keep http://ipv6.google.com/ running.
Good start, but it will be more useful when there's a name server
with glue.
* Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-25 03:29]:
My question might take this thread else where's, why hasn't the internet
community adopted ipv6?
because it is overengineered complex shit.
has been discussed a thousand times, we don't really need the 1001th...
--
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL
: Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:56:13
To:misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 LAN - IPv4 Internet
* Jonathan Schleifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-19 15:29]:
Barry Commander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I basically want the IPv6 clients on my LAN to be able to access
Mike wrote:
My question might take this thread else where's, why hasn't the internet
community adopted ipv6?
ipv6 wasn't it to replace ipv6?
And what are the pros vs cons to using internal ipv6 on ones net work?
Well, that all depends on what you mean by adopted, internet
community,
* Jonathan Schleifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-19 15:29]:
Barry Commander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I basically want the IPv6 clients on my LAN to be able to access IPv4
servers on the
internet transparantly - the router doing the IPv6-IPv4/IPv4-IPv6
conversion.
You'd have to use
Hi guys
I've found it very easy to get all the machines on my LAN speaking IPv6 but
would like them now
to be able to access the internet using IPv6 until they reach my router,
where it converts to IPv4
and relays the data to the internet, converting back to IPv6 on the return
route.
Is this
Barry Commander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this possible? Where would I find the information required to set
this up?
It reads like you want to be able to connect to v6 servers although you
only have v4 connectivity provided by your provider. If so, have a look
at:
I basically want the IPv6 clients on my LAN to be able to access IPv4
servers on the
internet transparantly - the router doing the IPv6-IPv4/IPv4-IPv6
conversion.
I was under the impression those tunnel brokers simply allow the IPv4
interface on my
router to access the limited IPv6 sites/servers
Barry Commander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I basically want the IPv6 clients on my LAN to be able to access IPv4
servers on the
internet transparantly - the router doing the IPv6-IPv4/IPv4-IPv6
conversion.
You'd have to use IPv4 inside then LAN and NAT at the router as well for
that to
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 01:33:18PM +, Barry Commander wrote:
| Hi guys
| I've found it very easy to get all the machines on my LAN speaking IPv6 but
| would like them now
| to be able to access the internet using IPv6 until they reach my router,
| where it converts to IPv4
| and relays the
Thanks Paul. Sorry for the confusion, I'd like to have only IPv6 traffic on
my LAN and
still be able to access IPv4 sites. I think i'll just stick to using sixx
for now.
Thanks again
Barry
On 19/03/2008, Paul de Weerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 01:33:18PM +, Barry
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 03:19:15PM +, Barry Commander wrote:
| Thanks Paul. Sorry for the confusion, I'd like to have only IPv6 traffic on
| my LAN and
| still be able to access IPv4 sites. I think i'll just stick to using sixx
| for now.
But what do you want to do ?
Several different
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 02:41:11PM +0100, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
If so, have a look at:
http://www.tunnelbroker.net/
http://www.sixxs.net/
http://www.freenet6.net/
Which one from above would you recomend to look at in first place?
Thanks.
--
Rafal Brodewicz
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 05:15:11PM +0100, Rafal Brodewicz wrote:
| On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 02:41:11PM +0100, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
| If so, have a look at:
|
| http://www.tunnelbroker.net/
| http://www.sixxs.net/
| http://www.freenet6.net/
|
| Which one from above would you recomend to
Barry Commander wrote:
I basically want the IPv6 clients on my LAN to be able to access IPv4
servers on the
internet transparantly - the router doing the IPv6-IPv4/IPv4-IPv6
conversion.
I was under the impression those tunnel brokers simply allow the IPv4
interface on my
router to access the
On 2008-03-19, Barry Commander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was under the impression those tunnel brokers simply allow the IPv4
interface on my router to access the limited IPv6 sites/servers
Most tunnel brokers allow you a /48 from which you can assign /64
subnets to your LAN/s. You can then
Paul de Weerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd recommend SixXS. It's what I use when there's no native v6. Just
Works (tm).
While technically not bad, they suck when it comes to problems. My
account was deleted with no further explaination, thus I asked them
why. I got a reply really fast and they
On 2008-03-19, Paul de Weerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd recommend SixXS. It's what I use when there's no native v6. Just
Works (tm).
I've experienced quite a lot of difference in reliability between
the various sixxs POPs...
Jonathan Schleifer schreef:
My RIPE handle had an old e-mail
and my MNT wasn't reachable, so I told them that. They responded me
very quickly and said I should talk to RIPE directly and get the mail
changed.
Hmm, I have that same issue (need it just for my SixXS account), I
should talk to
19 matches
Mail list logo
