Re: IPv6 virtual hosts

2008-12-22 Thread Henning Brauer
* Simon Vallet open...@castalie.org [2008-12-06 22:14]: On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 21:59:08 +0100 Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org wrote: My bad, mixing up between those two ;) Nevertheless note that the 1.3 docs might not apply to the special version of apache in openbsd, in part due to the

Re: IPv6 virtual hosts

2008-12-22 Thread Girish Venkatachalam
On 17:31:02 Dec 22, Henning Brauer wrote: if you plan to look at apache2 code, make sure you're close to a toilet. puke on the keyboard tends to be nasty. He he. I believe there is a new e-mail archival project called lucene which is written in the greatest programming language on the

Re: IPv6 virtual hosts

2008-12-07 Thread Simon Vallet
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:30:41 +0100 Dieter Rauschenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try # httpd -t -U Works! Which is odd, because the bracket notation doesn't seem very ambiguous to me. But hey. Thank you, Simon

IPv6 virtual hosts

2008-12-06 Thread Simon Vallet
Hi, since IPv6 is now supported in httpd -- :-) --, I'm trying to get my web server to use it. But somehow I can't find how to correctly configure VirtualHosts with IPv6 addresses : every combination of IPv6_address, IPv6_address port, and [IPv6_address]:port in NameVirtualHost and

Re: IPv6 virtual hosts

2008-12-06 Thread Jeroen Massar
Simon Vallet wrote: [..] Would I be missing something? The fact that generally people use NAMES and not IP addresses? It is not called __Name__VirtualHost for nothing ;) That said, afaik it does work in the real apache2's, but this is afaik a special patch for apache1. But as mentioned above

Re: IPv6 virtual hosts

2008-12-06 Thread Simon Vallet
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 21:17:39 +0100 Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Vallet wrote: [..] Would I be missing something? The fact that generally people use NAMES and not IP addresses? It is not called __Name__VirtualHost for nothing ;) ??

Re: IPv6 virtual hosts

2008-12-06 Thread Jeroen Massar
Simon Vallet wrote: On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 21:17:39 +0100 Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Vallet wrote: [..] Would I be missing something? The fact that generally people use NAMES and not IP addresses? It is not called __Name__VirtualHost for nothing ;) ??

Re: IPv6 virtual hosts

2008-12-06 Thread Simon Vallet
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 21:59:08 +0100 Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My bad, mixing up between those two ;) Nevertheless note that the 1.3 docs might not apply to the special version of apache in openbsd, in part due to the IPv6 patch. Somewhere I hope the devs didn't modify the code

Re: IPv6 virtual hosts

2008-12-06 Thread Dieter Rauschenberger
Hi, On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 06:25:43PM +0100, Simon Vallet wrote: ... [Sat Dec 6 18:03:48 2008] [error] Cannot resolve host 2001:7a8:b093:8::5 port 80 --- ignoring! [Sat Dec 6 18:03:48 2008] [error] Cannot resolve host 2001:7a8:b093:8::5 port 80 --- ignoring! I've been through