Re: Inconsistency between IPv6 and IPv4 announces between eBGP peers hooked through an iBGP session (OpenBGPd)

2010-02-08 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 03:21:32PM +0100, Laurent CARON wrote: On 30/01/2010 14:59, Laurent CARON wrote: My last test was with current as of 20100119. I did tests with 20091201 and 20091202 because the problem did appear just between those 2 dates and is reproductible. I'll try to upgrade

Re: Inconsistency between IPv6 and IPv4 announces between eBGP peers hooked through an iBGP session (OpenBGPd)

2010-02-08 Thread Laurent CARON
On 08/02/2010 18:41, Claudio Jeker wrote: Could you give it a spin? I just tried it and so far it seems successful. I'll let it run for a few days on my secondary bgp box and upgrade the primary one if successful. Many thanks

Re: Inconsistency between IPv6 and IPv4 announces between eBGP peers hooked through an iBGP session (OpenBGPd)

2010-01-30 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:50:21AM +0100, Laurent CARON wrote: On 19/01/2010 14:03, Laurent CARON wrote: On 19/01/2010 13:23, Sebastian Spies wrote: Seems, that the Cisco doesn't send the initial Keepalive. Could you please provide a longer caption using -s 4096 and the OPEN messages of

Re: Inconsistency between IPv6 and IPv4 announces between eBGP peers hooked through an iBGP session (OpenBGPd)

2010-01-30 Thread Laurent CARON
On 30/01/2010 13:49, Claudio Jeker wrote: I'll have a look at this. Please make sure you test against a -current bgpd instead of the 20091202 version since I already fixed a few issues with regard to the AF, AFI/SAFI - AID commit that was done between 20091201 and 20091202. Currently I have the

Re: Inconsistency between IPv6 and IPv4 announces between eBGP peers hooked through an iBGP session (OpenBGPd)

2010-01-30 Thread Laurent CARON
On 30/01/2010 14:59, Laurent CARON wrote: My last test was with current as of 20100119. I did tests with 20091201 and 20091202 because the problem did appear just between those 2 dates and is reproductible. I'll try to upgrade to current and see if it helps. Since no commits were done on

Re: Inconsistency between IPv6 and IPv4 announces between eBGP peers hooked through an iBGP session (OpenBGPd)

2010-01-21 Thread Laurent CARON
On 19/01/2010 14:03, Laurent CARON wrote: On 19/01/2010 13:23, Sebastian Spies wrote: Seems, that the Cisco doesn't send the initial Keepalive. Could you please provide a longer caption using -s 4096 and the OPEN messages of 20091201 $ tcpdump -s 4096 -w /tmp/bgpd_20091201_4096 -i bge0 host

Re: Inconsistency between IPv6 and IPv4 announces between eBGP peers hooked through an iBGP session (OpenBGPd)

2010-01-19 Thread Laurent CARON
On 09/01/2010 11:48, Laurent CARON wrote: IPv6 works in latest version only on iBGP link and in a tunnel link to hurricane electric but not directly to a cisco peer. Hi, I finally managed to track down the date of the commit that made the 2nd IPv6 session fail. cvs -d$CVSROOT up -D

Re: Inconsistency between IPv6 and IPv4 announces between eBGP peers hooked through an iBGP session (OpenBGPd)

2010-01-19 Thread Sebastian Spies
Laurent CARON wrote: On 09/01/2010 11:48, Laurent CARON wrote: IPv6 works in latest version only on iBGP link and in a tunnel link to hurricane electric but not directly to a cisco peer. Hi, I finally managed to track down the date of the commit that made the 2nd IPv6 session fail. cvs

Re: Inconsistency between IPv6 and IPv4 announces between eBGP peers hooked through an iBGP session (OpenBGPd)

2010-01-19 Thread Laurent CARON
On 19/01/2010 12:18, Sebastian Spies wrote: Would you please provide a packet capture? Here you go: http://zenon.apartia.fr/stuff/bgpd_20091201 = Working announces http://zenon.apartia.fr/stuff/bgpd_20091202 = Non-Working announces Captures produced with: $ tcpdump -w /tmp/bgpd_20091201 -i

Re: Inconsistency between IPv6 and IPv4 announces between eBGP peers hooked through an iBGP session (OpenBGPd)

2010-01-19 Thread Sebastian Spies
Laurent CARON wrote: On 19/01/2010 12:18, Sebastian Spies wrote: Would you please provide a packet capture? Here you go: http://zenon.apartia.fr/stuff/bgpd_20091201 = Working announces http://zenon.apartia.fr/stuff/bgpd_20091202 = Non-Working announces Captures produced with: $ tcpdump

Re: Inconsistency between IPv6 and IPv4 announces between eBGP peers hooked through an iBGP session (OpenBGPd)

2010-01-19 Thread Laurent CARON
On 19/01/2010 13:23, Sebastian Spies wrote: Seems, that the Cisco doesn't send the initial Keepalive. Could you please provide a longer caption using -s 4096 and the OPEN messages of 20091201 $ tcpdump -s 4096 -w /tmp/bgpd_20091201_4096 -i bge0 host 2001:7A8:1:9FF2::1 $ tcpdump -s 4096 -w

Re: Inconsistency between IPv6 and IPv4 announces between eBGP peers hooked through an iBGP session (OpenBGPd)

2010-01-09 Thread Laurent CARON
On 09/01/2010 03:58, Claudio Jeker wrote: The missing A is correct in this case. Because 'A' is only set when the network is announced on this router (config has a network XY statement). Since the prefix is in the Adj-Rib-Out it will be sent to the other side. Hi, Both prefixes (v4 and v6)

Re: Inconsistency between IPv6 and IPv4 announces between eBGP peers hooked through an iBGP session (OpenBGPd)

2010-01-08 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 04:39:28PM +0100, Laurent CARON wrote: Hi, Background: Two OpenBSD routers hooked each to two ISPs. Announced networks: 2001:7a8:820::/44 213.215.28.0/23 Relevant config snippets on bgpgw-001: http://pastebin.com/m77017bcd Relevant config snippets on

Re: Inconsistency between IPv6 and IPv4 announces between eBGP peers hooked through an iBGP session (OpenBGPd)

2010-01-06 Thread Laurent CARON
On 05/01/2010 16:39, Laurent CARON wrote: Hi, Background: Two OpenBSD routers hooked each to two ISPs. Announced networks: 2001:7a8:820::/44 213.215.28.0/23 Relevant config snippets on bgpgw-001: http://pastebin.com/m77017bcd Relevant config snippets on bgpgw-002:

Re: Inconsistency between IPv6 and IPv4 announces between eBGP peers hooked through an iBGP session (OpenBGPd)

2010-01-05 Thread Laurent CARON
On 05/01/2010 16:39, Laurent CARON wrote: Strangeness: On peer bgpgw-001: v4 and v6 networks are announced. On bgpgw-002 v6 networks are received from bgpgw-001 but not announced. bgpgw-001:/var/log# bgpctl sho rib neigh nerim-ipv6-bgp-peer out flags: * = Valid, = Selected, I = via IBGP, A =

Inconsistency between IPv6 and IPv4 announces between eBGP peers hooked through an iBGP session (OpenBGPd)

2010-01-05 Thread Laurent CARON
Hi, Background: Two OpenBSD routers hooked each to two ISPs. Announced networks: 2001:7a8:820::/44 213.215.28.0/23 Relevant config snippets on bgpgw-001: http://pastebin.com/m77017bcd Relevant config snippets on bgpgw-002: http://pastebin.com/d74d05557 Strangeness: On peer bgpgw-001: v4