Re: Memory problems on 4.5

2009-06-12 Thread Wade, Daniel
-Original Message- From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of Lars Kotthoff Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 9:17 AM To: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Memory problems on 4.5 Hi all, after upgrading to 4.5, I've had problems with the memory usage

Re: Memory problems on 4.5

2009-06-07 Thread Lars Kotthoff
please send vmstat -m and netstat -m at a point when the memory use is medium or high. See below. Total memory use is about 170MB. if you're using symon to collect your stats, it might be worth recording and plotting the mbuf stats it can save. That doesn't work anymore with 4.5 -- I got

Re: Memory problems on 4.5

2009-06-07 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009-06-07, Lars Kotthoff li...@larsko.org wrote: please send vmstat -m and netstat -m at a point when the memory use is medium or high. See below. Total memory use is about 170MB. if you're using symon to collect your stats, it might be worth recording and plotting the mbuf stats it can

Re: Memory problems on 4.5

2009-06-07 Thread Lars Kotthoff
that is way too high for what the system is doing. any way to try it with the ral(4) wireless card disabled to see if that makes any difference? (I have a feeling the wired RTL8139 rl(4) is more likely to have the problem but I guess those are going to be harder to disable..) Oh no, not

Memory problems on 4.5

2009-06-06 Thread Lars Kotthoff
Hi all, after upgrading to 4.5, I've had problems with the memory usage of the box increasing continuously until if starts to swap and performance becomes so bad that I have to reboot the box. This does not seem to be related to a specific program, at least the usual tools don't indicate that

Re: Memory problems on 4.5

2009-06-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009-06-06, Lars Kotthoff li...@larsko.org wrote: Hi all, after upgrading to 4.5, I've had problems with the memory usage of the box increasing continuously until if starts to swap and performance becomes so bad that I have to reboot the box. This does not seem to be related to a specific