Re: Memory usage of BIND process - threads?

2012-04-21 Thread Kostas Zorbadelos
Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org writes: On 2012-04-20, Kostas Zorbadelos kzo...@otenet.gr wrote: Just discovered that under Linux bind seems to use 5 threads (2 processors). Under the same VM config on OpenBSD bind seems to have no threads (using T under top(1)). In 5.0 and 5.1

Re: Memory usage of BIND process - threads?

2012-04-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012/04/21 11:54, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote: In -current this has changed however in OpenBSD BIND is built without threads anyway. Doesn't this affect BIND's performance? Anyway, a stress test will tell... Untested but in 5.1 and earlier I doubt you will see an improvement with threads,

Re: Memory usage of BIND process - threads?

2012-04-20 Thread Kostas Zorbadelos
Just discovered that under Linux bind seems to use 5 threads (2 processors). Under the same VM config on OpenBSD bind seems to have no threads (using T under top(1)). Is this part of the patches in the OpenBSD version of BIND? Regards, Kostas -- Kostas Zorbadelos

Re: Memory usage of BIND process - threads?

2012-04-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012-04-20, Kostas Zorbadelos kzo...@otenet.gr wrote: Just discovered that under Linux bind seems to use 5 threads (2 processors). Under the same VM config on OpenBSD bind seems to have no threads (using T under top(1)). In 5.0 and 5.1 threads are entirely done in userland and won't show