Re: Missing x*42.tgz installation file sets from i386 binary snapshots

2007-08-02 Thread Adriaan
On 8/1/07, Heinrich Rebehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > > With the dependency of some packages on the expat XML parser f in > > xbase42.tgz, you really cannot some install somel binary snaphots > > packages when xbase42.tgz isn't there [snip] > Aaahhh! That's why i cannot install bash under

Re: Missing x*42.tgz installation file sets from i386 binary snapshots

2007-08-01 Thread Adriaan
On 8/1/07, vladas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/1/07, Peter N. M. Hansteen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > vladas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Did you try AnonCVS? Works (around 30th) for me. > > > > cvs works, but if you build the system yourself, you're not actually > > testing snapsh

Re: Missing x*42.tgz installation file sets from i386 binary snapshots

2007-08-01 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
vladas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Did you try AnonCVS? Works (around 30th) for me. cvs works, but if you build the system yourself, you're not actually testing snapshots anymore. I think that's what OP wanted to do. Install snapshots fresh, report if there's breakage. Other lazy bastards t

Re: Missing x*42.tgz installation file sets from i386 binary snapshots

2007-08-01 Thread Heinrich Rebehn
Adriaan wrote: On 8/1/07, Peter N. M. Hansteen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Adriaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: There are no X installation file sets for i386 snapshots. Don't slashdot it just yet. I think we can be reasonably sure that even on i386, OpenBSD 4.2 will ship with installable X bi

Re: Missing x*42.tgz installation file sets from i386 binary snapshots

2007-08-01 Thread vladas
> With the dependency of some packages on the expat XML parser f in > xbase42.tgz, you really cannot some install somel binary snaphots > packages when xbase42.tgz isn't there Did you try AnonCVS? Works (around 30th) for me.

Re: Missing x*42.tgz installation file sets from i386 binary snapshots

2007-08-01 Thread Adriaan
On 8/1/07, Peter N. M. Hansteen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adriaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > There are no X installation file sets for i386 snapshots. > > Don't slashdot it just yet. I think we can be reasonably sure that > even on i386, OpenBSD 4.2 will ship with installable X binaries.

Re: Missing x*42.tgz installation file sets from i386 binary snapshots

2007-08-01 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
Adriaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There are no X installation file sets for i386 snapshots. Don't slashdot it just yet. I think we can be reasonably sure that even on i386, OpenBSD 4.2 will ship with installable X binaries. For one reason or the other the x* parts did not get built or at le

Missing x*42.tgz installation file sets from i386 binary snapshots

2007-08-01 Thread Adriaan
There are no X installation file sets for i386 snapshots. >From ftp.openbsd.org . - 100767 Jul 31 14:03 INSTALL.i386 22354 Jul 31 14:03 INSTALL.linux 1019 Jul 31 14:03 MD5 42575374 Jul 31 14:03 base42.tgz 6208870 Ju