to make my rc.conf.local more sensible and consistent, i.e.
not
pf=YES
sshd=
named_flags=
but rather
pf=YES
sshd=YES
named=YES?
How about something like this?
# system options
pf=YES
# daemons
sshd_flags=
named_flags=
Mikkel Bang wrote:
I'm just thinking that from a layman's perspective named_flags=
doesn't make as much sense as named=YES if all you want to do is start
named.
The way it is right now seems more like monkey patching from the days
before OpenBSD became popular. I acknowledge the whole it's been
Le 2012-08-29 09:57, Mikkel Bang a écrit :
If OpenBSD was on Git / at GitHub, youngins like me would have patched
this baby up a long time ago.
Sadly, a good argument against moving to Git.
Simon
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Mikkel Bang facebookman...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just thinking that from a layman's perspective named_flags=
doesn't make as much sense as named=YES if all you want to do is start
named.
The way it is right now seems more like monkey patching from the days
On 2012 Aug 29 (Wed) at 15:57:09 +0200 (+0200), Mikkel Bang wrote:
:If OpenBSD was on Git / at GitHub, youngins like me would have patched
:this baby up a long time ago.
1) Here's a nickle, go learn to use cvs.
2) We'd reject the patch anyways.
--
Stop searching. Happiness is right next to
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:22:38AM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote:
Le 2012-08-29 09:57, Mikkel Bang a ?crit :
If OpenBSD was on Git / at GitHub, youngins like me would have patched
this baby up a long time ago.
Sadly, a good argument against moving to Git.
Simon
Whatcha 'git agit gitting
On Aug 29, 2012, at 6:57, Mikkel Bang facebookman...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just thinking that from a layman's perspective named_flags=
doesn't make as much sense as named=YES if all you want to do is start
named.
I can't tell if you're trolling or not. Seriously, tho: is uninformed
beginners
On 2012-08-25, Mikkel Bang facebookman...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
Is there a way to make my rc.conf.local more sensible and consistent, i.e. not
pf=YES
sshd=
named_flags=
but rather
pf=YES
sshd=YES
named=YES?
How about something like this?
# system options
pf=YES
# daemons
Hello!
Is there a way to make my rc.conf.local more sensible and consistent, i.e. not
pf=YES
sshd=
named_flags=
but rather
pf=YES
sshd=YES
named=YES?
Thanks!
Mikkel
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:55:00 +0200
Mikkel Bang facebookman...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
Is there a way to make my rc.conf.local more sensible and consistent, i.e. not
pf=YES
sshd=
named_flags=
but rather
pf=YES
sshd=YES
named=YES?
Thanks!
Mikkel
pf doesn't have options
On 08/25/12 21:08, Robert wrote:
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:55:00 +0200
Mikkel Bang facebookman...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
Is there a way to make my rc.conf.local more sensible and consistent, i.e. not
pf=YES
sshd=
named_flags=
but rather
pf=YES
sshd=YES
named=YES?
You may still want
(For sake of the argument: pfctl has options, maybe they should be a
rc.conf option for it?)
pfctl is not a daemon per se, as opposed to e.g. smtpd or httpd.
As far as enabling pf and loading the ruleset, only a subset of the
pfctl flags are of interest.
Therefore, there is
12 matches
Mail list logo