On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Jussi Peltola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The other option I believe would be using PF to round robin the packets
on
both destinations using route-to rules. Would this work?
Why wouldn't it?
Not that I can think of, I guess that is why I am emailing the list
On 2008-11-05, Mikel Lindsaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The other option I believe would be using PF to round robin the packets on
both destinations using route-to rules. Would this work?
it should, but you might need to make the rules stateless (no state).
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:40:02AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008-11-05, Mikel Lindsaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The other option I believe would be using PF to round robin the packets on
both destinations using route-to rules. Would this work?
it should, but you might need to
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:45 AM, andrew fresh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:40:02AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008-11-05, Mikel Lindsaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The other option I believe would be using PF to round robin the packets
on
both destinations
Hi all,
I am trying to get 4mb/s of IAX2 voice traffic to a single VOIP provider
using an IAX2 trunk down here in Australia. One of the options we have is
getting a 4mb SHDSL connection with an ISP. The ISP usually want to install
a CISCO 1841 with two WIC1-SHDSL cards at a lease rate of $2,400
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 01:02:33PM +1100, Mikel Lindsaar wrote:
After reading http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html it looks that equal cost
routing will not do what I want as it looks like each destination is mapped
to one possible route out of a pool, which I believe means I'll only ever
get
6 matches
Mail list logo