-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Daniel Ouellet
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 5:54 PM
To: OpenBSD
Subject: Re: OT Was: Wanted: OpenBSD Systems Administrator
your job(s) offer instead of your jobs@, etc if you think
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Theo de Raadt
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 6:48 PM
To: Christopher Snell
Cc: OpenBSD
Subject: Re: OT Was: Wanted: OpenBSD Systems Administrator
And if anyone wanted my opinion, I am fine
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 11:45:37AM -0500, Umnada Tyrolla wrote:
your job(s) offer instead of your jobs@, etc if you think it is that
badly needed...
http://openbsdsupport.org/jobs/
An admin interface will be added to post your jobs. For now
send it in
if you have any and I
Umnada Tyrolla wrote:
I don't think that really helped the problem any. How are the
headhunters going to know about it?
That's better then complaining and doing nothing and was an answer to
the request for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, as describe on the site Please only send OpenBSD specific
On 1/4/07 2:17 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Get real, meta postings (postings about other postings) also build
this misc community. You cannot expect a channel to carry 100% data
(relevance),
What should we insist on?
Is there something to insist on on an open list? As I tried to
explain, an
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Nope. We can't aim higher when there are people like you, full of
hate, and once again not adding real content.
i hate those haters! we should hang their leader, it will fix everything.
;)
On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
Tom Bombadil wrote:
The just guy sent one single e-mail asking if a bsd user wanted a job,
which I bet many among us might be interested.
I've certainly heard from consulting customers who got my info from the
consultants page at OpenBSD ... It's
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Diana Eichert
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 9:03 AM
To: OpenBSD
Subject: OT Was: Wanted: OpenBSD Systems Administrator
On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
Tom Bombadil wrote:
The just guy sent one single e-mail asking if a bsd user
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Diana Eichert
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 9:03 AM
To: OpenBSD
Subject: OT Was: Wanted: OpenBSD Systems Administrator
On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
Tom Bombadil wrote:
The just
Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO allowing employers to seek out OBSD admins for employment helps
further encourage OBSD use.
misc@ is not for encouraging openbsd use, that's what advocacy@ is for.
So why can't there be a jobs@ or something similar? Is there a
philosophical reason
]
-Original Message-
From: Adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 1:40 PM
To: Dan Farrell
Cc: OpenBSD
Subject: Re: OT Was: Wanted: OpenBSD Systems Administrator
Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO allowing employers to seek out OBSD admins for employment
Adam wrote:
Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO allowing employers to seek out OBSD admins for employment helps
further encourage OBSD use.
misc@ is not for encouraging openbsd use, that's what advocacy@ is for.
Promoting the use of OpenBSD. Non-technical discussions in
On Jan 3, 2007, at 2:27 PM, Kenny Mann wrote:
I'm failing to understand why this is such a big deal... I must be
missing something.
Some people enjoy patronizing others. It makes them feel better
about themselves.
--
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net
The real problem is that when outsiders stumble into our newsgroups,
we shriek, Ni! Ni! and
demand another shrubbery. Maybe we should just chill out a bit.
On Jan 3, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Kenny Mann wrote:
Adam wrote:
Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO allowing employers to seek out
Jack J. Woehr wrote:
The real problem is that when outsiders stumble into our newsgroups,
we shriek, Ni! Ni! and
demand another shrubbery. Maybe we should just chill out a bit.
True. I'm currently evaluating OpenBSD and I am trying to understand the
mindset of OpenBSD users by reading the
* Patrick Useldinger wrote:
Jack J. Woehr wrote:
The real problem is that when outsiders stumble into our newsgroups,
we shriek, Ni! Ni! and
demand another shrubbery. Maybe we should just chill out a bit.
True. I'm currently evaluating OpenBSD and I am trying to understand the
mindset
On 1/3/07, Patrick Useldinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack J. Woehr wrote:
The real problem is that when outsiders stumble into our newsgroups,
we shriek, Ni! Ni! and
demand another shrubbery. Maybe we should just chill out a bit.
True. I'm currently evaluating OpenBSD and I am trying to
On 1/3/07, Patrick Useldinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack J. Woehr wrote:
The real problem is that when outsiders stumble into our newsgroups,
we shriek, Ni! Ni! and
demand another shrubbery. Maybe we should just chill out a bit.
True. I'm currently evaluating OpenBSD and I am trying to
Kenny Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
His response was a bit rude, however at least the courtesy was made to
attempt a reading on the rules page. He made the best decision he could
given the information he had.
No, he posted to the openbsd user questions and answers list something
that is
On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:07:16 +0100, Patrick Useldinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Jack J. Woehr wrote:
The real problem is that when outsiders stumble into our newsgroups,
we shriek, Ni! Ni! and
demand another shrubbery. Maybe we should just chill out a bit.
True. I'm currently evaluating
For once, I'm going to say this from my position as an OpenBSD
developer who has sunk countless hours into writing code for this OS.
It's obvious a lot of wankers around here have nothing better to do than
start threads based on that job offer.
I am perfectly happy with someone posting a job
Peace, and to move on,
I don't know if that's any good or not or even needed really. But like
many wanted How To saying it would be much better, however the results
are not overwhelming, but peace came from it anyway. Here is a place for
your job(s) offer instead of your jobs@, etc if you
On 1/3/07, Kenny Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
His response was a bit rude, however at least the courtesy was made to
attempt a reading on the rules page. He made the best decision he could
given the information he had.
Hi All,
I apologize if my posting offended anyone. That really was not
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Christopher Snell wrote:
Hi All,
I apologize if my posting offended anyone. That really was not my
intent. I *do* read this list regularly, attend OpenBSD-related
SNIP
Chris
Nah, no apology needed, except perhaps an apology from myself, since I
never intended this
And if anyone wanted my opinion, I am fine with the occasional (but
rare) job posting which is polite, to the point, and relevant to
OpenBSD.
But I am not OK with all the whiners and lamers who followed up on
that posting with trash talk. That's about 35 postings so far, it
looks like. And I
Get real, meta postings (postings about other postings) also build
this misc community. You cannot expect a channel to carry 100% data
(relevance),
What should we insist on?
How about 20%?
Or can we aim higher?
Nope. We can't aim higher when there are people like you, full of
hate, and
26 matches
Mail list logo
