On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Holger Kipp wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:47:35AM +0100, Michal wrote:
For the masses:
- NetBSD: Run on any hardware (including toasters)
- OpenBSD: Be as secure as possible
- FreeBSD: provide best system for x86-platforms
It's a mistake to make this association.
OBSD is the best choice of OS for people who like violent little fish
mascots.
And it has blue-boot-console-thingy (tm) . Ace.
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Kester
Sent: 19 June 2009 20:24
To: freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Open Vs Free BSD
On Fri 19 Jun 2009 at 11:23:26 PDT Michael R. Wayne wrote:
OK, I'm going
From: Anton Parol anton.pa...@sun.com
OBSD is the best choice of OS for people who like violent little fish
mascots.
And it has blue-boot-console-thingy (tm) . Ace.
I wasn't going to contribute to this thread, but I have to ask. *What*
blue-boot-console-thingy?
I'm not sure it's sensible
Daniel Bolgheroni schrieb:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Holger Kipp wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:47:35AM +0100, Michal wrote:
For the masses:
- NetBSD: Run on any hardware (including toasters)
- OpenBSD: Be as secure as possible
- FreeBSD: provide best system for x86-platforms
Someone once said this too me
Comparing FreeBSD and OpenBSD, FreeBSD is generally better at disk-related
I/O whereas OpenBSD handles net-I/O better. No test has been carried out to
prove this though.
Every offence to the person which said this, but they are not the best admin
ever, though
-sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Michal
Sent: 19 June 2009 10:48 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org; freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
Subject: Open Vs Free BSD
Someone once said this too me
Comparing FreeBSD and OpenBSD, FreeBSD is generally better at disk-related
I/O whereas OpenBSD handles net-I/O better
@openbsd.org; freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
Subject: Open Vs Free BSD
Someone once said this too me
Comparing FreeBSD and OpenBSD, FreeBSD is generally better at disk-related
I/O whereas OpenBSD handles net-I/O better. No test has been carried out to
prove this though.
Every offence
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:47:35AM +0100, Michal wrote:
Someone once said this too me
Comparing FreeBSD and OpenBSD, FreeBSD is generally better at disk-related
I/O whereas OpenBSD handles net-I/O better. No test has been carried out to
prove this though.
Every offence to the person which
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Michal
Sent: 19 June 2009 10:48 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org; freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
Subject: Open Vs Free BSD
Someone once said this too me
Comparing FreeBSD and OpenBSD
and the security is in netbsd:
http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?security+8+NetBSD-5.0
http://www.netbsd.org/~elad/recent/recent06.pdf
On 6/19/09, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
Kim Attree wrote:
NetBSD runs on just about anything. That's it's primary goal. Since I
don't
have any
Oh why can't this versus this versus that never dies? There had been
raging debate about which OSes is much better compared to the others since
time immemorial. Sure, each one has its own merits over the others and
vice versa. So why feeding this issue up since up to this very moment,
there is no
I have used NetBSD several years on mainly amd64 platform, and these are
+ properties.
- Xen support and boot NetBSD as dom0 and a Linux ie; Ubuntu as domU.
- Clean design of rc.d scripts. Also NetBSD does not automatically
populate rc.d scripts, user adds sample one (displayed after
On Friday 19 June 2009 04:47:35 Michal wrote:
Someone once said this too me
Comparing FreeBSD and OpenBSD, FreeBSD is generally better at disk-related
I/O whereas OpenBSD handles net-I/O better. No test has been carried out to
prove this though.
Every offence to the person which said this,
I agree. Thanks for reminding. I will not reply to this one anymore.
Regards,
Cem
dem...@thephinix.org, 06/19/09 14:41:
Oh why can't this versus this versus that never dies? There had been
raging debate about which OSes is much better compared to the others since
time immemorial. Sure, each
...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
dem...@thephinix.org
Sent: 19 June 2009 12:42
To: freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Open Vs Free BSD
Oh why can't this versus this versus that never dies? There had been
raging debate about which OSes is much better compared to the others since
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 01:02:40PM +0100, Michal wrote:
It wasn't an argument or a versus anything. It was just a question relating
to what he had said and the truth in it and the two OS's being used for
different reasons. That's all. No rage, no debate or looking for any winner!
To be fair,
On 19 Jun 2009, at 14:02, Timo Schoeler wrote:
Sure, each one has its own merits over the others and
vice versa.
Above all, they contribute to the genetic diversity in the operating
system pool.
Which is a good thing.
- Ruben
...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
dem...@thephinix.org
Sent: 19 June 2009 12:42
To: freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Open Vs Free BSD
Oh why can't this versus this versus that never dies? There had been
raging debate about which OSes is much better compared
[mailto:owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] Em nome de Giancarlo Razzolini
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 19 de junho de 2009 11:01
Para: Michal
Cc: misc@openbsd.org; dem...@thephinix.org; freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
Assunto: Re: Open Vs Free BSD
Michal escreveu:
It wasn't an argument or a versus anything
trying to accomplish.. It'll help *nix/BSD today
and in the future.
The words you chose from the subject to the bottom of your e-mail, were
the wrong ones Open
Vs Free BSD for me, and for most here, is literally OpenBSD versus
FreeBSD
21 matches
Mail list logo
