On 2/10/09, Jesus Sanchez zexe...@gmail.com wrote:
Josh Grosse escribis:
O.o... another computer with screen near??
Yep! right in front of me ;-)
belive me, print out some pages would affect the subsistence of
trees, the paper factories use controlated environments with fast grown
trees
Hi,
I am new to *BSD and I am trying to instal openBSD 4.4 on an amd64
platform. I tried to find out how to have INSTALL.amd64 displayed
somewhere during installation (like opening a second console and using
less) but it seems that only one console is available during install.
Is there a way to
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:52:08 +0200, Neoklis Kyriazis wrote
Is there a way to have the installation notes handy apart from a
dead tree printout?
One can have the notes present in machine-readable form. Handy? No.
The ramdisk kernel operates in single-user mode, so there is no alternate
Josh Grosse escribis:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:52:08 +0200, Neoklis Kyriazis wrote
Is there a way to have the installation notes handy apart from a
dead tree printout?
One can have the notes present in machine-readable form. Handy? No.
The ramdisk kernel operates in single-user
Hello all,
I'm new to OpenBSD, I installed it a few times but than did not know
what to do realy. Right now I'm little more experienced with Linux and I
thought give it a nother try.
Now I'm runnin an Openbsd 3.9 Box.
Default setup. I try to run a Webmailbox and later Openvpn.
It did not work
misiu wrote:
Hello all,
I'm new to OpenBSD, I installed it a few times but than did not know
what to do realy. Right now I'm little more experienced with Linux and I
thought give it a nother try.
Now I'm runnin an Openbsd 3.9 Box.
Default setup. I try to run a Webmailbox and later Openvpn.
misiu wrote:
Hello all,
I'm new to OpenBSD, I installed it a few times but than did not know
what to do realy. Right now I'm little more experienced with Linux and I
thought give it a nother try.
Now I'm runnin an Openbsd 3.9 Box.
Default setup. I try to run a Webmailbox and later
Tony Abernethy schrieb:
The problem with a changed root is that everything you will ever
need to access needs to be inside this changed root.
All the libriaries, etc etc --- that's right, another copy.
One advantage of OpenBSD is that they actually understand security.
(Most that tries to
misiu wrote:
Tony Abernethy schrieb:
The problem with a changed root is that everything you will ever
need to access needs to be inside this changed root.
All the libriaries, etc etc --- that's right, another copy.
One advantage of OpenBSD is that they actually understand security.
(Most
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:21:54PM +0200, misiu wrote:
Tony Abernethy schrieb:
The problem with a changed root is that everything you will ever
need to access needs to be inside this changed root.
All the libriaries, etc etc --- that's right, another copy.
One advantage of OpenBSD is
Or you could run mod_perl
Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:21:54PM +0200, misiu wrote:
Tony Abernethy schrieb:
The problem with a changed root is that everything you will ever
need to access needs to be inside this changed root.
All the libriaries,
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 03:02:04PM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:21:54PM +0200, misiu wrote:
Tony Abernethy schrieb:
The problem with a changed root is that everything you will ever
need to access needs to be
misiu wrote:
Hello all,
I'm new to OpenBSD, I installed it a few times but than did not know
what to do realy. Right now I'm little more experienced with Linux and I
thought give it a nother try.
Now I'm runnin an Openbsd 3.9 Box.
Default setup. I try to run a Webmailbox and later Openvpn.
Wrt LFS .. is it production ready?
no, it's a disaster.
Kind of off topic, but has any work been done towards implementing
McKusick's snapshot and background fsck techniques in ffs?
-N
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:48:59AM -0500, Nick Bender wrote:
Wrt LFS .. is it production ready?
no, it's a disaster.
Kind of off topic, but has any work been done towards implementing
McKusick's snapshot and background fsck techniques in ffs?
Different project focuses it seems.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:48:59AM -0500, Nick Bender wrote:
Kind of off topic, but has any work been done towards implementing
McKusick's snapshot and background fsck techniques in ffs?
I just won't say that the number of people working on it is inversely
proportional to the number of people
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
I'm working on a embedded project and have been cycling through some
tradeoffs wrt using cf cards as disks.
I know these devices support wear-leveling, but I'm not sure how this
could work
Andrew Atrens wrote:
...
And finally one last question that applies to both FFS and LFS - file
access/creation/modification metadata updates. Specifically I'm thinking
of atime's. Is there any way to switch off atime updates ? They don't
add much value for me, and I'm worried they might unduly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Hall wrote:
Andrew Atrens wrote:
...
And finally one last question that applies to both FFS and LFS - file
access/creation/modification metadata updates. Specifically I'm thinking
of atime's. Is there any way to switch off atime
On 1/17/06, Andrew Atrens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[a little paranoid, are we?]
Wrt LFS .. is it production ready?
no, it's a disaster.
Hello,
it's my first time OpenBSD problem: I setup a network configuration with IPsec
and a GRE tunnel. There is an IPsec connection between a local loopback
interface (lo1) and a remote loopback interface (dummy0 on a Linux box). The
gre interface uses these loopbacks as tunnel src/dest.
21 matches
Mail list logo
