Re: OpenBSD in VirtualBox 3.1.x on non-SMP machine

2010-01-11 Thread Chris Eidem
According to http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Guest_OSes: Requires VT-x or AMD-V hardware virtualization support. It would appear they've therefore made VT-x and friends non- configurable. You can file a bug report and see where that goes. Am 20 Dec 2009 um 10:18 schrieb Tomas Bodzar: Hi

Re: OpenBSD in VirtualBox 3.1.x on non-SMP machine

2010-01-08 Thread Bayard Bell
According to http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Guest_OSes: Requires VT-x or AMD-V hardware virtualization support. It would appear they've therefore made VT-x and friends non- configurable. You can file a bug report and see where that goes. Am 20 Dec 2009 um 10:18 schrieb Tomas Bodzar: Hi all,

Re: OpenBSD in VirtualBox 3.1.x on non-SMP machine

2010-01-08 Thread Peter Kay - Syllopsium
From: Bayard Bell buf...@mac.com Requires VT-x or AMD-V hardware virtualization support. It would appear they've therefore made VT-x and friends non- configurable. You can file a bug report and see where that goes. Would it be too cynical to suggest using a product which doesn't suck? It

Re: OpenBSD in VirtualBox 3.1.x on non-SMP machine

2010-01-08 Thread Ishwor Gurung
Hi Tomas, 2009/12/20 Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com: Hi all, someone have running OpenBSD release/stable/current on new line of VirtualBox (3.1.x) on non-SMP machine? Older version 3.0.x was ok. Now it sets VT-x/AMD-V as default and you can't change it. Even when I disable it directly

OpenBSD in VirtualBox 3.1.x on non-SMP machine

2009-12-20 Thread Tomas Bodzar
Hi all, someone have running OpenBSD release/stable/current on new line of VirtualBox (3.1.x) on non-SMP machine? Older version 3.0.x was ok. Now it sets VT-x/AMD-V as default and you can't change it. Even when I disable it directly in .xml config file for guest it still try this feature. With