Re: PF Tables scoping.

2010-06-03 Thread James Records
Ok, I think I have found the root cause of this issue, In /usr/src/sys/net/pf_table.c on line 2198 in pfr_attach_table: *struct pfr_ktable * pfr_attach_table(struct pf_ruleset *rs, char *name, int intr) { struct pfr_ktable *kt, *rt; struct pfr_table tbl;

PF Tables scoping.

2010-06-02 Thread James Records
Hi All, Having an issue with anchors and tables again, I had this same issue a couple of years ago in 4.5 but never got any response, hoping someone can shed some light onto what I'm missing here, or if this is even supported, I'm trying to use an overload rule inside of an anchor to populate a

Re: PF Tables scoping.

2010-06-02 Thread James Records
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:48 AM, James Records james.reco...@gmail.comwrote: Hi All, Having an issue with anchors and tables again, I had this same issue a couple of years ago in 4.5 but never got any response, hoping someone can shed some light onto what I'm missing here, or if this is even

Re: PF Tables scoping.

2010-06-02 Thread Calomel Org
James, I can confirm. If a table is created by an anchor with the same name as an existing table the following error is printed: pfctl: warning: namespace collision with BLOCKTEMP global table. The anchors table is different from the main pf table. pfctl -vvs Tables --a-rhC BLOCKTEMP