Re: Pf memory pool limits don't have immediate effects when loading a ruleset above the previous limit

f Benjamin Girard Sent: 22 February 2020 13:33 To: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Pf memory pool limits don't have immediate effects when loading a ruleset above the previous limit Hi misc, So I'm running 6.6 with latest syspatch as of today. I'm trying to load the default ruleset that come

Pf memory pool limits don't have immediate effects when loading a ruleset above the previous limit

Hi misc, So I'm running 6.6 with latest syspatch as of today. I'm trying to load the default ruleset that comes with 6.6 with an extra file taht contains more than 1000 tables which is the default hard limit, my only change is to include that extra file. Since i've more than 1000 tables I

Re: PF and Pool

Insan Praja SW insan.pr...@gmail.com writes: These must be a problem right? I've tried replacing RAM since I think these are memory problem. But it keep coming. Then I updated to current, it's not going anywhere. I think somewhere in the h/w there's something really wrong. nothing is

PF and Pool

Hi Misc@, On -i386current, using systat I noticed some problems: on pf page, TYPE NAME VALUE RATE NOTES counter memory 14644826 170.04 on pool page, NAME SIZE REQUESTS FAILINUSEPGREQ PGREL NPAGE HIWAT