Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Post (snap) update emails: fsck errors and (in)security output

2023-12-28 Thread Why 42? The lists account.
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 08:20:37AM -0300, Crystal Kolipe wrote: > > login.conf used to allow unlimited datasize for the 'daemon' class. That was > > changed to cap at 4G > > Actually the value is an architecture dependent setting. > > On amd64 it is indeed 4G, but typically 1024 Mb on the small

Re: Post (snap) update emails: fsck errors and (in)security output

2023-12-21 Thread Crystal Kolipe
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:54:14AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2023-12-20, Why 42? The lists account. wrote: > > > > Just tried the mount of /tmp manually from the command line at got: > > mount_mfs: mmap: Cannot allocate memory > > > > When I halved the size (memory) allocated (-s=2097152

Re: Post (snap) update emails: fsck errors and (in)security output

2023-12-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2023-12-20, Why 42? The lists account. wrote: > > Just tried the mount of /tmp manually from the command line at got: > mount_mfs: mmap: Cannot allocate memory > > When I halved the size (memory) allocated (-s=2097152) it mounts > successfully: > mjoelnir:robb 20.12 19:50:02 # df -h /tmp > File

Re: Post (snap) update emails: fsck errors and (in)security output

2023-12-20 Thread Crystal Kolipe
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 12:16:33AM +0200, Mihai Popescu wrote: > > Why didn't you just bump the daemon datasize in /etc/login.conf to the > > required value? > > this is there for a reason and if you keep "bumping" it, maybe it should be > removed. OK, then: 1. Read the docs and source. 2. Mak

Re: Post (snap) update emails: fsck errors and (in)security output

2023-12-20 Thread Mihai Popescu
> Why didn't you just bump the daemon datasize in /etc/login.conf to the > required value? Because The Creator said once this is there for a reason and if you keep "bumping" it, maybe it should be removed.

Re: Post (snap) update emails: fsck errors and (in)security output

2023-12-20 Thread Crystal Kolipe
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 07:55:29PM +0100, Why 42? The lists account. wrote: > When I halved the size (memory) allocated (-s=2097152) it mounts > successfully Why didn't you just bump the daemon datasize in /etc/login.conf to the required value?

Re: Post (snap) update emails: fsck errors and (in)security output

2023-12-20 Thread Why 42? The lists account.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 10:57:41AM -0500, Nick Holland wrote: > the ROOTBACKUP process is making an image of a live file system; fsck > grumblings ARE expected. It's just one of those things you aren't supposed > to do (but I do it regularly, because normally, you can get away with it). > > Why

Re: Post (snap) update emails: fsck errors and (in)security output

2023-12-20 Thread Nick Holland
On 12/20/23 06:02, Why 42? The lists account. wrote: ... Reply-To: Hi All, A couple of questions ... I have "ROOTBACKUP=1" in /etc/daily.local to replicate my root partition as described in the FAQ (https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#altroot) I noticed after an update to a new snapshot vi

Post (snap) update emails: fsck errors and (in)security output

2023-12-20 Thread Why 42? The lists account.
... Reply-To: Hi All, A couple of questions ... I have "ROOTBACKUP=1" in /etc/daily.local to replicate my root partition as described in the FAQ (https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#altroot) I noticed after an update to a new snapshot via sysupgrade that the next daily output email contains