Re: Protectli FW1 with Intel 82583V - Interfaces errors and latency spike issue

2021-01-03 Thread steve
I tested with a Protectli FW1 router (dmesg below) forwarding packets between two test machines. The latency spikes occur when running headless beginning with this commit: commit 78cd60329a9b42e2a8e91bb88c3d556b4e420e89 Author: jsg Date: Mon Sep 9 01:35:43 2019 + When no display

Re: Protectli FW1 with Intel 82583V - Interfaces errors and latency spike issue

2020-08-17 Thread Gabri Tofano
Nope, I tried here misc@/bugs@, Reddit and with Protectli but unfortunately no luck. I might have to try to install -current or wait for the next release and see. On 2020-08-16 19:30, Steve Woodward wrote: Were you able to resolve this issue? On Jun 10, 2020, at 15:59, obs...@loopw.com

Re: Protectli FW1 with Intel 82583V - Interfaces errors and latency spike issue

2020-08-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020-08-17, Gabri Tofano wrote: FRW-FW1# netstat -i NameMtu Network Address Ipkts IfailOpkts Ofail Colls em0 1500xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx1317600 2351 466114 0 0 em0 1500 74.215.235/ xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx

Re: Protectli FW1 with Intel 82583V - Interfaces errors and latency spike issue

2020-08-16 Thread Steve Woodward
Were you able to resolve this issue? > On Jun 10, 2020, at 15:59, obs...@loopw.com wrote: > > I have a small fleet of protectli firewalls, all of them with em nics. Only > the units i’ve upgraded to 6.7 are showing interface errors, where 6.6 is > definitely not. > > >> On Jun 8, 2020, at

Re: Protectli FW1 with Intel 82583V - Interfaces errors and latency spike issue

2020-06-11 Thread Gabri Tofano
After extensive testing the latency spikes shown up again: To the inside interface of the firewall: Reply from 172.16.200.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=254 Reply from 172.16.200.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=254 Reply from 172.16.200.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=254 Reply from 172.16.200.1: bytes=32 time<1ms

Re: Protectli FW1 with Intel 82583V - Interfaces errors and latency spike issue

2020-06-11 Thread Gabri Tofano
That's funny because when I received your e-mail I was almost done in installing OpenBSD 6.6. Another user pointed out to me that in the OpenBSD 6.7 release notes there is a statement in regards of the em(4) drivers: "Improvements in the em(4) driver." and so I have gave it a try. It looks

Re: Protectli FW1 with Intel 82583V - Interfaces errors and latency spike issue

2020-06-10 Thread obsdml
I have a small fleet of protectli firewalls, all of them with em nics. Only the units i’ve upgraded to 6.7 are showing interface errors, where 6.6 is definitely not. > On Jun 8, 2020, at 5:30 PM, Gabri Tofano wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm sending this e-mail since I have found other users in

Protectli FW1 with Intel 82583V - Interfaces errors and latency spike issue

2020-06-09 Thread Gabri Tofano
Hi all, I'm sending this e-mail since I have found other users in this mailing-list using the same device without issues. I'm using a "Protectli FW1" with FreeBSD 12.1 amd64 as a firewall which is serving me with great performances and no issues at all. The appliance has 4 Intel Gigabit