Giancarlo Razzolini:
> >> I noticed OpenBSD anon CVS SSH fingerprints have the bit length
> >> published with the algorithm type:
> >> http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html
> > That seems useless.
> That's not useless. SSHFP records have the algorithm type, and the
> fingerprint type.
But they don
On 2014-10-20 Mon 21:37 PM |, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> On 2014-10-20, Craig R. Skinner wrote:
>
> > I noticed OpenBSD anon CVS SSH fingerprints have the bit length
> > published with the algorithm type:
> > http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html
>
> That seems useless.
>
> > Is it important t
On 20-10-2014 19:37, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> On 2014-10-20, Craig R. Skinner wrote:
>
>> I noticed OpenBSD anon CVS SSH fingerprints have the bit length
>> published with the algorithm type:
>> http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html
> That seems useless.
That's not useless. SSHFP records have t
On 2014-10-20, Craig R. Skinner wrote:
> I noticed OpenBSD anon CVS SSH fingerprints have the bit length
> published with the algorithm type:
> http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html
That seems useless.
> The bit length doesn't appear in the known_hosts file.
Implicitly it does. Try "ssh-keygen
Hi,
I noticed OpenBSD anon CVS SSH fingerprints have the bit length
published with the algorithm type:
http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html
A couple of other popular non-OpenBSD sites omit the bit length:
16:27:ac:a5:76:28:2d:36:63:1b:56:4d:eb:df:a6:48 (RSA)
ad:1c:08:a4:40:e3:6f:9c:f5:66:26:5d:4b
5 matches
Mail list logo