Re: RAIDFrame, failed component

2005-11-18 Thread Kurt B. Kaiser
Dennis S.Davidoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Wednesday, November 16, 2005, 11:35:16 PM, you wrote: KBK I'm not sure what to make of 'component1'. It's not an explicit KBK device, did you use that string your raid0.conf? The first slot in KBK these commands should refer to an explicit

Re: RAIDFrame, failed component

2005-11-17 Thread Dennis S.Davidoff
Wednesday, November 16, 2005, 11:35:16 PM, you wrote: KBK Dennis S.Davidoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How to reconfigure RAIDFrame to use another hdd? Earler I have such configuration with NON-existent hdd (wd2): ... START disks /dev/wd1e /dev/wd2e ... Now, I need to replace

RAIDFrame, failed component

2005-11-16 Thread Dennis S.Davidoff
Hi all. How to reconfigure RAIDFrame to use another hdd? Earler I have such configuration with NON-existent hdd (wd2): ... START disks /dev/wd1e /dev/wd2e ... Now, I need to replace non-existent wd2e with wd0e. Disklabel for wd0 identical to wd1e. After reading raidctl(8) I did following:

Re: RAIDFrame, failed component

2005-11-16 Thread Kurt B. Kaiser
Dennis S.Davidoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How to reconfigure RAIDFrame to use another hdd? Earler I have such configuration with NON-existent hdd (wd2): ... START disks /dev/wd1e /dev/wd2e ... Now, I need to replace non-existent wd2e with wd0e. Disklabel for wd0 identical to wd1e.

Re: RAIDFrame, failed component

2005-11-16 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
I'm not sure what to make of 'component1'. It's not an explicit For some reason, RAIDFrame refers to a missing drive component1 whenever the RAID device is initialized and the drive is absent. ~BAS device, did you use that string your raid0.conf? The first slot in these commands should