Re: BGP peering, 2 peers, hardware reqirements questions

2005-09-17 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Fri, 16.09.2005 at 14:49:18 +0100, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your own as, two full bgp feeds and just let bgp decide path. Loadsharing is usually pretty good, this depends *very*much* to whom you are connected, and how. Please remember that one of the main points in BGP is

Re: BGP peering, 2 peers, hardware reqirements questions

2005-09-15 Thread j knight
Karl O. Pinc wrote: I do recall some OpenBGP hooks into pf. Maybe there's a way to use these to make failover work. You need BGP pure and simple. The only caveat with BGP on OpenBSD is that you cannot do equal cost load balancing. For instance, if your providers send you a default route,

Re: BGP peering, 2 peers, hardware reqirements questions

2005-09-13 Thread Darrin Chandler
You might also want to read http://www.inetdaemon.com/columns/ask/internet-load-balancing.shtml, which will try to talk you out of using BGP for load balancing and present a simpler alternative. j knight wrote: --- Quoting Karl O. Pinc on 2005/09/13 at 01:05 +: Finally, not knowing

Re: BGP peering, 2 peers, hardware reqirements questions

2005-09-13 Thread j knight
--- Quoting Darrin Chandler on 2005/09/13 at 13:56 -0700: You might also want to read http://www.inetdaemon.com/columns/ask/internet-load-balancing.shtml, which will try to talk you out of using BGP for load balancing and present a simpler alternative. This solution talks about using