Don't reinvent wheel. Use what do you like.
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:53 PM, trustlevel-...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I noticed the mailing list archives seem to have different levels of content
or maybe search mechanism (more found in gmane than monkey.org). What do
people think is the best one,
Every time someone tells me to go search an archive, I want to use
profanity. They never think of just how painful mail archive searching
is, but I guess we all have to bite the bullet and use search systems
that are bad at searching.
2010/3/4 nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com:
Every time someone tells me to go search an archive, I want to use
profanity. They never think of just how painful mail archive searching
is, but I guess we all have to bite the bullet and use search systems
that are bad at searching.
Do you realize how
It's simple if you want to know something about OpenBSD. Here is list :
1) Read FAQ
2) Read man
if you can't find what you want (which is not possible, but some info
is maybe too much technical) then :
3) Mail list archive - I use marc.info
4) IRC
5) Internet
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:43 PM,
On 3/4/2010 7:43 AM, nixlists wrote:
Every time someone tells me to go search an archive, I want to use
profanity. They never think of just how painful mail archive searching
is, but I guess we all have to bite the bullet and use search systems
that are bad at searching.
You could start your
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:56:00AM -0300, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
2010/3/4 nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com:
Every time someone tells me to go search an archive, I want to use
profanity. They never think of just how painful mail archive searching
is, but I guess we all have to bite the
mailing.openbsd.tech is on Google groups, I don't see
mailing.openbsd.misc. Searching on Google groups works quite well,
would be nice to see this list there.
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:43 AM, nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com wrote:
Every time someone tells me to go search an archive, I want to use
profanity. They never think of just how painful mail archive searching
is, but I guess we all have to bite the bullet and use search systems
that are bad at
Odd. I search/browse a few months back into archive at least, and not
because someone tells me to do it, and I still don't find answers
sometimes (and searching still sucks, but ignore my whining).
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Bryan wrote:
On 3/4/2010 7:43 AM, nixlists wrote:
Every time someone tells me to go search an archive, I want to use
profanity. They never think of just how painful mail archive searching
is, but I guess we all have to bite the bullet and use search systems
that are bad at
Having contributed to MARC I think it's a pretty good site. Hank has also
added lists, as in the PCC lists, when I requested.
I didn't say MARC is a bad site.
But has a point. Mail archives are dead as an interface. Google
knows all. We should be asking 'Did you ask Google?' rather than
'Did you search the mail archives.' I'm sure many people have to
go Google 'mail archives' to figure out what they are anyway. :-).
Ken
I like it as much as
2010/3/4 Kenneth R Westerback kwesterb...@rogers.com:
But has a point. Mail archives are dead as an interface. Google
knows all. We should be asking 'Did you ask Google?' rather than
'Did you search the mail archives.' I'm sure many people have to
go Google 'mail archives' to figure out what
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 03:23:24PM +0100, Bret S. Lambert wrote:
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:56:00AM -0300, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
2010/3/4 nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com:
Every time someone tells me to go search an archive, I want to use
profanity. They never think of just how
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 11:08 -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 03:23:24PM +0100, Bret S. Lambert wrote:
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:56:00AM -0300, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
2010/3/4 nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com:
Every time someone tells me to go search an
15 matches
Mail list logo
