On 2022-01-10 3:53 a.m., Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 09:17:25PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:24:05AM -0700, Ted Bullock wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2022-01-10 2:18 a.m., Jonathan Gray wrote:
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 01:43:32PM -0700, Ted Bullock wrote:
On 2022-01-10 3:53 a.m., Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 09:17:25PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:24:05AM -0700, Ted Bullock wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2022-01-10 2:18 a.m., Jonathan Gray wrote:
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 01:43:32PM -0700, Ted Bullock wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 09:17:25PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:24:05AM -0700, Ted Bullock wrote:
> >
> > On 2022-01-10 2:18 a.m., Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 01:43:32PM -0700, Ted Bullock wrote:
> > > > The manpage incorrectly describes the
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:24:05AM -0700, Ted Bullock wrote:
>
> On 2022-01-10 2:18 a.m., Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 01:43:32PM -0700, Ted Bullock wrote:
> > > The manpage incorrectly describes the behaviour and usage of
> > > pci_mapreg_probe(9). This function does not
On 2022-01-10 2:18 a.m., Jonathan Gray wrote:
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 01:43:32PM -0700, Ted Bullock wrote:
The manpage incorrectly describes the behaviour and usage of
pci_mapreg_probe(9). This function does not return 0 for success and !0
for failure as described in the manual, see the diff
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 01:43:32PM -0700, Ted Bullock wrote:
> The manpage incorrectly describes the behaviour and usage of
> pci_mapreg_probe(9). This function does not return 0 for success and !0
> for failure as described in the manual, see the diff below for a
> possible re-wording and
6 matches
Mail list logo
