On 10/19/13 06:43, Scott McEachern wrote:
List, I'm bringing you into the middle of an off-list conversation where
I'm setting up a RAID10 array. Well, I'm using two RAID1 arrays as the
drives for a RAID0 array.
All relevant information follows. Any clue to why I'm ending up with an
array 1/4
On 10/19/13 13:10, Alexander Hall wrote:
On 10/19/13 06:43, Scott McEachern wrote:
List, I'm bringing you into the middle of an off-list conversation where
I'm setting up a RAID10 array. Well, I'm using two RAID1 arrays as the
drives for a RAID0 array.
All relevant information follows. Any
On 2013-10-18, Scott McEachern sc...@blackstaff.ca wrote:
Circumstances change, and I might be able to redeploy those HDDs as a
RAID5 array. This, at least in theory, would allow the 18TB total to be
realized as 15TB as RAID5, gaining me 6TB.
even if softraid would rebuild raid5, I'd worry
On 10/18/13 07:31, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013-10-18, Scott McEachern sc...@blackstaff.ca wrote:
Circumstances change, and I might be able to redeploy those HDDs as a
RAID5 array. This, at least in theory, would allow the 18TB total to be
realized as 15TB as RAID5, gaining me 6TB.
even if
List, I'm bringing you into the middle of an off-list conversation where
I'm setting up a RAID10 array. Well, I'm using two RAID1 arrays as the
drives for a RAID0 array.
All relevant information follows. Any clue to why I'm ending up with an
array 1/4 the size I'm expecting?
On 10/18/13
On 10/17/13 20:07, Scott McEachern wrote:
...
I realize the bioctl(8) man page says Use of the CRYPTO RAID 4/5
disciplines are currently considered experimental.
...
I've never tried softraid's RAID5, so I have no idea if it truly is
experimental, or solid like CRYPTO, or somewhere in
On 10/17/13 20:57, Nick Holland wrote:
with the exception of the fact there's no code to rebuild a failed
disk, works great. that's a pretty big exception for most people. :)
Hmm. That would present a problem.
Let me make sure I'm absolutely clear here:
A RAID5 array with four disks. I
On 10/17/13 21:34, Scott McEachern wrote:
On 10/17/13 20:57, Nick Holland wrote:
with the exception of the fact there's no code to rebuild a failed
disk, works great. that's a pretty big exception for most people. :)
Hmm. That would present a problem.
Let me make sure I'm absolutely
8 matches
Mail list logo
