Hello Martin,
ah that's cool too hear. Thanks for the clarification.
Kind regards
Karsten Horsmann
Am 05.11.2017 10:18 vorm. schrieb "Martin Pieuchot" :
On 05/11/17(Sun) 09:32, Karsten Horsmann wrote:
> [...]
> The nice FAQ told use that openbsd pf don't benefits much from
Hi Mihai,
first I am not an openbsd guru. I am more an happy user like you.
I read of some other BSDs (DragonflyBSD, FreeBSD) that they bring more smp
support into pf.
https://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/perf.html
The nice FAQ told use that openbsd pf don't benefits much from smp.
So I assume
On 05/11/17(Sun) 09:32, Karsten Horsmann wrote:
> [...]
> The nice FAQ told use that openbsd pf don't benefits much from smp.
That's wrong.
> So I assume that's an more single thread processing for pf.
It's multiple threads but they don't run in parallel.
> I also guess that it is the "keep
On 05/11/17(Sun) 09:39, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> [...]
> This is rather a tech@ question but i'm not high enough for that list.
> I see some articles about the fact the network stack in OpenBSD is
> locked or single threaded. IT may be the same thing, i don't really
> know.
>
> Can anyone share
4 matches
Mail list logo