Re: Packet loss with latest snapshot

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019, 13:29 David Gwynne, wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:36:23AM +0100, Tony Sarendal wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019, 09:43 Tony Sarendal, wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Den m??n 4 mars 2019 kl 09:26 skrev Tony Sarendal : > > > > > >> Den s??n 3 mars 2019 kl 21:35 skrev Theo de

Re: Packet loss with latest snapshot

On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:36:23AM +0100, Tony Sarendal wrote: > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019, 09:43 Tony Sarendal, wrote: > > > > > > > Den m??n 4 mars 2019 kl 09:26 skrev Tony Sarendal : > > > >> Den s??n 3 mars 2019 kl 21:35 skrev Theo de Raadt : > >> > >>> Tony, > >>> > >>> Are you out of your mind?

Re: Packet loss with latest snapshot

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019, 09:43 Tony Sarendal, wrote: > > > Den mån 4 mars 2019 kl 09:26 skrev Tony Sarendal : > >> Den sön 3 mars 2019 kl 21:35 skrev Theo de Raadt : >> >>> Tony, >>> >>> Are you out of your mind? You didn't provide even a rough hint about >>> what your firewall configuration looks

Re: Packet loss with latest snapshot

Den mån 4 mars 2019 kl 09:26 skrev Tony Sarendal : > Den sön 3 mars 2019 kl 21:35 skrev Theo de Raadt : > >> Tony, >> >> Are you out of your mind? You didn't provide even a rough hint about >> what your firewall configuration looks like. You recognize that's >> pathetic, right? >> >> > Earlier

Re: Packet loss with latest snapshot

Den sön 3 mars 2019 kl 21:35 skrev Theo de Raadt : > Tony, > > Are you out of your mind? You didn't provide even a rough hint about > what your firewall configuration looks like. You recognize that's > pathetic, right? > > > Earlier in the week I could run parallel ping-pong tests through my

Re: Packet loss with latest snapshot

Tony, Are you out of your mind? You didn't provide even a rough hint about what your firewall configuration looks like. You recognize that's pathetic, right? > Earlier in the week I could run parallel ping-pong tests through my test > firewalls > at 300kpps without any packet loss. I updated