Re: Plans for an online meeting regarding Radiotap

2009-08-23 Thread Mike Kershaw
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 05:04:20PM +0200, G?bor Stefanik wrote: Besides, you're supposed to make at least two implementations when proposing a standard field. If I remember correctly, I made an implementation for the Linux kernel (a generator-side implementation) and one for Wireshark (a

Re: Plans for an online meeting regarding Radiotap

2009-08-21 Thread Gábor Stefanik
2009/8/21 Johannes Berg johan...@sipsolutions.net: On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 16:31 +0200, Gabor Stefanik wrote: Hope to see you on Freenode at the set date. Again, if the time is a problem, respond, and I will try to find a better time. I don't think there's any need to have an IRC meeting.

Re: Plans for an online meeting regarding Radiotap

2009-08-21 Thread Gábor Stefanik
2009/8/21 Johannes Berg johan...@sipsolutions.net: On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 16:41 +0200, Gabor Stefanik wrote: My intention with the meeting is to form an actual proposal that all implementors can agree on. We can produce proposals, and even new standardized fields to no avail, as some

Re: Plans for an online meeting regarding Radiotap

2009-08-21 Thread Johannes Berg
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 16:31 +0200, GC!bor Stefanik wrote: Hope to see you on Freenode at the set date. Again, if the time is a problem, respond, and I will try to find a better time. I don't think there's any need to have an IRC meeting. We've hashed out the way forward multiple times on the

Re: Plans for an online meeting regarding Radiotap

2009-08-21 Thread Johannes Berg
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 16:41 +0200, GC!bor Stefanik wrote: My intention with the meeting is to form an actual proposal that all implementors can agree on. We can produce proposals, and even new standardized fields to no avail, as some implementors (especially OpenBSD) appear to be stuck with

Re: Plans for an online meeting regarding Radiotap

2009-08-21 Thread Johannes Berg
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 17:04 +0200, GC!bor Stefanik wrote: I've reworked RTS/CTS since then, just haven't got to sending a new proposal yet. The current plan is as follows: TX_FLAGS 0x0002: Use CTS TX_FLAGS 0x0004: Use RTS TX_FLAGS 0x0020: Disable RTS/CTS usage Seems a bit strange,

Re: Plans for an online meeting regarding Radiotap

2009-08-21 Thread Gábor Stefanik
2009/8/21 Johannes Berg johan...@sipsolutions.net: On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 17:04 +0200, Gabor Stefanik wrote: I've reworked RTS/CTS since then, just haven't got to sending a new proposal yet. The current plan is as follows: TX_FLAGS 0x0002: Use CTS TX_FLAGS 0x0004: Use RTS TX_FLAGS

Re: Plans for an online meeting regarding Radiotap

2009-08-21 Thread Alexander Hall
This is not about OpenBSD. Stop this insane cross-posting. Gabor Stefanik wrote: 2009/8/21 Johannes Berg johan...@sipsolutions.net: On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 17:04 +0200, Gabor Stefanik wrote: I've reworked RTS/CTS since then, just haven't got to sending a new proposal yet. The current plan is

Re: Plans for an online meeting regarding Radiotap

2009-08-21 Thread Dave Young
2009/8/22 GC!bor Stefanik netrolller...@gmail.com: 2009/8/21 Johannes Berg johan...@sipsolutions.net: On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 17:04 +0200, GC!bor Stefanik wrote: I've reworked RTS/CTS since then, just haven't got to sending a new proposal yet. The current plan is as follows: TX_FLAGS 0x0002: