On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:06:12AM -0400, Martin Gignac wrote:
On 10/11/06, Girish Venkatachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I'm familiar with 3261. However the SIP proxy that 3261 talks
about has a completely different function than what an ALG/SBC does.
Maybe I shouldn't have used the
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 02:31:29PM -0400, Martin Gignac wrote:
On 10/11/06, Jon Radel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If my memory serves me right, SIP actually has ALG built into the
standard itself and www.opensip.org might already give you what you
want.
Hmm, wasn't aware of that. Do you
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:41:49AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/10/12 01:15, ropers wrote:
Neither do I understand what really goes on during IP forwarding as
opposed to bridging
with forwarding(routing) tcp/ip packets have a destination IP address
which isn't bound to an
I'd like to thank everybody for their comments. I'm listening and
learning. Keep those posts coming! :)
--ropers
On 2006/10/12 14:39, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:41:49AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/10/12 01:15, ropers wrote:
Neither do I understand what really goes on during IP forwarding as
opposed to bridging
with forwarding(routing) tcp/ip packets have a
On 12/10/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or, for that matter, why I needed to enable
net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf for the bridge to work.
just checked and you definitely don't need net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
to bridge. net.inet.ip.forwarding is for IP packets,
On 2006/10/12 13:57, ropers wrote:
On 12/10/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or, for that matter, why I needed to enable
net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf for the bridge to
work.
just checked and you definitely don't need net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
to bridge.
On 10/11/06, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just had another thought:
Why do the IP phones have to have public IPs?
Is this because giving them NATted, private range IPs previously
didn't work so well?
The VoIP phones Patrick is using are probably (my guess) using the
Session
On 11/10/06, Martin Gignac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/11/06, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just had another thought:
Why do the IP phones have to have public IPs?
Is this because giving them NATted, private range IPs previously
didn't work so well?
The VoIP phones Patrick is
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 09:32:07AM -0400, Martin Gignac wrote:
On 10/11/06, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just had another thought:
Why do the IP phones have to have public IPs?
Is this because giving them NATted, private range IPs previously
didn't work so well?
The VoIP phones
On 10/11/06, Girish Venkatachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If my memory serves me right, SIP actually has ALG built into the standard
itself and www.opensip.org might already give you what you want.
Hmm, wasn't aware of that. Do you have any specific RFC or 3GPP spec
number that I could
Yes, I've tried siproxd, but my lack of knowledge has caused me to fail
to get this working properly.
I'm VERY excited with all the responses you folks gave me. Now I have
to take the time to read all them over. I'll respond to the other posts
very soon.
Thank you once again for all the
Yes, I've tried siproxd, but my lack of knowledge has caused me to fail
to get this working properly.
Then using your available public IPs should be the ticket.
-Martin
--
Suburbia is where the developer bulldozes out the trees, then names
the streets after them.
Martin Gignac wrote:
On 10/11/06, Girish Venkatachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If my memory serves me right, SIP actually has ALG built into the
standard itself and www.opensip.org might already give you what you want.
Hmm, wasn't aware of that. Do you have any specific RFC or 3GPP
On 10/11/06, Jon Radel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If my memory serves me right, SIP actually has ALG built into the
standard itself and www.opensip.org might already give you what you want.
Hmm, wasn't aware of that. Do you have any specific RFC or 3GPP spec
number that I could check out
On 10/9/06, Patrick - South Valley Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a box I installed OpenBSD 3.9 on. I'm trying to get this box to
function as our office firewall. Here's the catch - we have VOIP phones
that contact an external VOIP server outside of our firewall. I've been
On 11/10/06, Martin Gignac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I've tried siproxd, but my lack of knowledge has caused me to fail
to get this working properly.
Then using your available public IPs should be the ticket.
-Martin
Yah, it's becoming clearer. Use whatever is cleaner and easier to
Hey Jens,
On 10/11/06, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OTOH, if you do have enough public IPs to play with, I'd still
consider bridging and using only public IPs (then you don't need to do
VLANs or NAT).
To satisfy my own curiosity, what are the advantages in your view that
bridging offers
On 11/10/06, Martin Gignac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Jens,
On 10/11/06, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OTOH, if you do have enough public IPs to play with, I'd still
consider bridging and using only public IPs (then you don't need to do
VLANs or NAT).
To satisfy my own curiosity, what
On 2006/10/12 01:15, ropers wrote:
Or maybe I have gotten a small chunk off of that big fat 123.0.0.0/8
network to play with. So let's say I have been allocated
123.123.123.0/24.
Normally, you get a separate address _as_well_. Let's say 123.4.5.6/30.
Say you don't run a dynamic routing
Hi again Jens,
On 10/11/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006/10/12 01:15, ropers wrote:
Or maybe I have gotten a small chunk off of that big fat 123.0.0.0/8
network to play with. So let's say I have been allocated
123.123.123.0/24.
Normally, you get a separate address
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 12:22:06PM -0400, Martin Gignac wrote:
On 10/11/06, Girish Venkatachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If my memory serves me right, SIP actually has ALG built into the standard
itself and www.opensip.org might already give you what you want.
Hmm, wasn't aware of that.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:26:21AM +0530, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 12:22:06PM -0400, Martin Gignac wrote:
On 10/11/06, Girish Venkatachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If my memory serves me right, SIP actually has ALG built into the standard
itself and
On 10/12/06, Girish Venkatachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very Sorry Martin. I was not in a good mood this morning and I also got angry
since I didn't know enough to help you out.
Have a nice day! Hope you don't take it to heart.
No sweat. :-)
--
Suburbia is where the developer
On 10/11/06, Girish Venkatachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 12:22:06PM -0400, Martin Gignac wrote:
On 10/11/06, Girish Venkatachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If my memory serves me right, SIP actually has ALG built into the standard
itself and www.opensip.org might
On 10/12/06, Martin Gignac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I'm familiar with 3261. However the SIP proxy that 3261 talks
about has a completely different function than what an ALG/SBC does.
Maybe I shouldn't have used the term SIP proxy in my previous
e-mails. My bad.
I don't know if it'll
We currently have a Cisco PIX firewall that we are using for our office
firewall and our VOIP phones. The guy who was here before me only gave
the office computers 32 available DHCP addresses, and set all the VOIP
phones (Cisco 7960 and Grandstream phones) on static ips.
What other
What other information can I provide you to help me come up with a solution?
A quick ASCII diagram of the PIX and the subnets in front and back
might help (I'm the visual type).
The only subnet you mention with public IPs in your first e-mail is
216.139.44.142/26, in which the IPs mentioned in
Thanks for the response Martin. Maybe I wasn't clear enough. Let me
rephrase everything in this email:
We currently have a firewall using a Cisco PIX server. Everything on
this firewall is using a static ip of some sort. There is a range of IP
addresses inside the PIX firewall that are
We currently have a firewall using a Cisco PIX server. Everything on
this firewall is using a static ip of some sort. There is a range of IP
addresses inside the PIX firewall that are being used for DHCP.
Just to make sure: you say everything on this firewall is using a
static IP of some
On 10/9/06, Patrick - South Valley Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Get two NICS for the OpenBSD box.
2) Give the first NIC an external routeable IP address, ex.
216.139.44.142 subnet 255.255.255.192
3) Give the second NIC an internal IP address, ex. 10.30.1.1 subnet mask
255.255.255.0
4)
On 10/10/06, Patrick - South Valley Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a box I installed OpenBSD 3.9 on. I'm trying to get this box to
function as our office firewall. Here's the catch - we have VOIP phones
that contact an external VOIP server outside of our firewall. I've been
On 10/10/06, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/10/06, Patrick - South Valley Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a box I installed OpenBSD 3.9 on. I'm trying to get this box to
function as our office firewall. Here's the catch - we have VOIP phones
that contact an
On 10/9/06, Patrick - South Valley Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Get two NICS for the OpenBSD box.
2) Give the first NIC an external routeable IP address, ex.
216.139.44.142 subnet 255.255.255.192
3) Give the second NIC an internal IP address, ex. 10.30.1.1 subnet mask
255.255.255.0
4)
34 matches
Mail list logo
