Re: Should 80MB of RAM be enough for kernel relinking on i386?

2021-09-22 Thread Andre Smagin
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:27:30 +0100 "Patrick Harper" wrote: > If the situation isn't going to change anytime soon then I have some > diffs for INSTALL.i386 and INSTALL.amd64. The latter has not specified > disk requirements, I guess since anyone who owns an amd64 system will > very likely be

Re: Should 80MB of RAM be enough for kernel relinking on i386?

2021-09-22 Thread Patrick Harper
If the situation isn't going to change anytime soon then I have some diffs for INSTALL.i386 and INSTALL.amd64. The latter has not specified disk requirements, I guess since anyone who owns an amd64 system will very likely be using a disk big enough for X, so I figured that the same would apply

Re: Should 80MB of RAM be enough for kernel relinking on i386?

2021-07-16 Thread Patrick Harper
> Your swap is only 256MB. That seem too low. (We have walked away > from making it correspond to physical memory, but still, it seems > uncomfortably low). > > As well, /usr seems a bit large, leaving not much for /home. > > The autoallocation scheme might have made a less than perfect >

Re: Should 80MB of RAM be enough for kernel relinking on i386?

2021-07-16 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 08:48:54AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 05:28:06PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > > > The problem appears to be here: > > > > > > > wdc2 at pcmcia0 function 0 "TRANSCEND, TS8GCF133, " port 0x340/16: irq 3 > > > >

Re: Should 80MB of RAM be enough for kernel relinking on i386?

2021-07-15 Thread Theo de Raadt
Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 05:28:06PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > The problem appears to be here: > > > > > wdc2 at pcmcia0 function 0 "TRANSCEND, TS8GCF133, " port 0x340/16: irq 3 > > > wd1 at wdc2 channel 0 drive 0: > > > wd1: 1-sector PIO, LBA48, 7647MB, 15662304

Re: Should 80MB of RAM be enough for kernel relinking on i386?

2021-07-15 Thread Theo de Raadt
Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2021-07-15, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 05:28:06PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > >> The problem appears to be here: > >> > >> > wdc2 at pcmcia0 function 0 "TRANSCEND, TS8GCF133, " port 0x340/16: irq 3 > >> > wd1 at wdc2 channel 0 drive 0:

Re: Should 80MB of RAM be enough for kernel relinking on i386?

2021-07-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2021-07-15, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 05:28:06PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > >> The problem appears to be here: >> >> > wdc2 at pcmcia0 function 0 "TRANSCEND, TS8GCF133, " port 0x340/16: irq 3 >> > wd1 at wdc2 channel 0 drive 0: >> > wd1: 1-sector PIO, LBA48, 7647MB,

Re: Should 80MB of RAM be enough for kernel relinking on i386?

2021-07-15 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 05:28:06PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > The problem appears to be here: > > > wdc2 at pcmcia0 function 0 "TRANSCEND, TS8GCF133, " port 0x340/16: irq 3 > > wd1 at wdc2 channel 0 drive 0: > > wd1: 1-sector PIO, LBA48, 7647MB, 15662304 sectors > > wd1(wdc2:0:0): using BIOS

Re: Should 80MB of RAM be enough for kernel relinking on i386?

2021-07-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2021-07-14, Patrick Harper wrote: > Hi All, > > The installation program on my Intel P5/80MB RAM machine works fine up > to 'Relinking to create unique kernel...', during which the system > either reboots or eventually prints a kernel panic message. If 80MB is > not enough under normal

Re: Should 80MB of RAM be enough for kernel relinking on i386?

2021-07-14 Thread Theo de Raadt
The problem appears to be here: > wdc2 at pcmcia0 function 0 "TRANSCEND, TS8GCF133, " port 0x340/16: irq 3 > wd1 at wdc2 channel 0 drive 0: > wd1: 1-sector PIO, LBA48, 7647MB, 15662304 sectors > wd1(wdc2:0:0): using BIOS timings > a: 1060.6M 64 4.2BSD 2048 16384