Re: soekris

2006-03-23 Thread Peter
--- Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anybody have a soekris box and would like to give a shell account for some testing? I am considering to buy one for me, but i would like, previously, to be able to feel what it is like. What sort of testing? About feelings, it depends on what

Re: soekris

2006-03-23 Thread marrandy
On Thursday 23 March 2006 13:08, you wrote: SNIP Other than that, my system performs very well on a small lan and I am very happy. Here is my df: Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/wd0a 118M 21.7M 90.0M19%/ mfs:30147 7.8M100K7.3M

Re: soekris

2006-03-23 Thread Peter
--- marrandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 23 March 2006 13:08, you wrote: SNIP Other than that, my system performs very well on a small lan and I am very happy. Here is my df: Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/wd0a 118M 21.7M 90.0M

Re: soekris

2006-03-23 Thread marrandy
On Thursday 23 March 2006 15:41, you wrote: Why isn't /var listed in MFS ? Logs etc # ls -lh /var lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8B Dec 16 21:28 /var - /tmp/var I was wondering if you had done something like that. Hows it holding up with only 7.8MB for both /tmp and /var ? Any crashes

Re: soekris

2006-03-23 Thread Peter
--- marrandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 23 March 2006 15:41, you wrote: Why isn't /var listed in MFS ? Logs etc # ls -lh /var lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8B Dec 16 21:28 /var - /tmp/var I was wondering if you had done something like that. Hows it holding up

Re: Soekris VPN1411 seen but not used w/stock 3.8

2006-03-08 Thread Gordon Grieder
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 06:07:30PM -0500, jared r r spiegel wrote: including the commandlines of said benchmarks would have been hot, in this case. i'm inclined to ask how you determined the benchmarks prove that it isn't used ( watching 'systat vmstat', time(1)'ing them, etc ),

Re: Soekris VPN1411 seen but not used w/stock 3.8

2006-03-08 Thread jared r r spiegel
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 06:29:47PM -0600, Gordon Grieder wrote: On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 06:07:30PM -0500, jared r r spiegel wrote: including the commandlines of said benchmarks would have been hot, in this case. The speed with and without userland crypto enabled was the same for

Re: Soekris VPN1411 seen but not used w/stock 3.8

2006-03-08 Thread Gordon Grieder
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 07:59:02PM -0500, jared r r spiegel wrote: only thing i guess i can offer is: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=108215148805896w=2 and to say that i've used a 1401 on a desktop and 1411s in soekris 4801s without issue(*) from 3.7 on up to the

Re: Soekris VPN1411 seen but not used w/stock 3.8

2006-03-08 Thread Theo de Raadt
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 07:59:02PM -0500, jared r r spiegel wrote: only thing i guess i can offer is: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=108215148805896w=2 and to say that i've used a 1401 on a desktop and 1411s in soekris 4801s without issue(*) from 3.7 on up to

Re: Soekris

2005-12-08 Thread Gustavo Rios
One ore question: I was thinking going for net4526-30 model. Is 64MB CF enough to run openbsd 3.8 for a wireless router? Thanks in advance. 2005/12/8, Rick Aliwalas [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Gustavo Rios wrote: I hear CF is slow! Is that true? Which is faster: a 2.4 hard disk

Re: Soekris

2005-12-08 Thread Thomas Börnert
Yes, you need only 22 MB :-) Thomas On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 09:41 -0200, Gustavo Rios wrote: One ore question: I was thinking going for net4526-30 model. Is 64MB CF enough to run openbsd 3.8 for a wireless router? Thanks in advance. 2005/12/8, Rick Aliwalas [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu,

Re: Soekris

2005-12-08 Thread James Strandboge
On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 12:47 +0100, Thomas BC6rnert wrote: Yes, you need only 22 MB :-) Thomas On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 09:41 -0200, Gustavo Rios wrote: One ore question: I was thinking going for net4526-30 model. Is 64MB CF enough to run openbsd 3.8 for a wireless router? It has

Re: Soekris

2005-12-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
--On 08 December 2005 09:41 -0200, Gustavo Rios wrote: I was thinking going for net4526-30 model. Is 64MB CF enough to run openbsd 3.8 for a wireless router? Not a full OpenBSD (you want 256MB unless you trim the installation). You can look at flashboot (which fits on a 4526-20) or

Re: Soekris

2005-12-07 Thread dustin
If there is anyone here running such hardware, i would like to hear which harddisk and wireless (as also the anthena if it came apart) device are you running. I'm running a net4801, with a Nikon 16MB starter CF card and a DLink PCI prism based card. I do not belive the net4526 has any disk

Re: Soekris

2005-12-07 Thread Stuart Henderson
--On 07 December 2005 16:40 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If there is anyone here running such hardware, i would like to hear which harddisk and wireless (as also the anthena if it came apart) device are you running. I'm running a net4801, with a Nikon 16MB starter CF card and a DLink PCI

Re: Soekris

2005-12-07 Thread Gustavo Rios
Thanks you all for your time and cooperation. I would like a small router, with a single hard disk and a wireless device. Which would it be the perfect soekris models? What you are you running? Thanks once more. 2005/12/7, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: --On 07 December 2005 16:40 -0800,

Re: [Soekris] Ubiquity 400mW mini-PCI

2005-10-06 Thread Vincent Immler
maybe this link helps: http://www.exergia.biz/ptp/exap-GMF.htm

Re: Soekris OBSD as servers

2005-08-05 Thread Abraham Al-Saleh
On 8/4/05, Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/5/05, Scott Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/4/05, Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to set a obsd and soekris boxes as a server for about 100 users. This box is supposed to handle NIS + Kerberos. Does

Re: Soekris OBSD as servers

2005-08-05 Thread Bob Beck
I have used machines of the category of a pentium 100 before for such tasks, so there is no reason why a soekris would not work for that. (NIS and kerberos) However, given the cost difference between the soekris hardware and something slithgly more beefy, like a comell or nexcomm

Re: Soekris OBSD as servers

2005-08-04 Thread Scott Francis
On 8/4/05, Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to set a obsd and soekris boxes as a server for about 100 users. This box is supposed to handle NIS + Kerberos. Does such configuration can handle the task ? I mean on a performance matter. Does anybody have such configuration?

Re: Soekris OBSD as servers

2005-08-04 Thread Gustavo Rios
On 8/5/05, Scott Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/4/05, Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to set a obsd and soekris boxes as a server for about 100 users. This box is supposed to handle NIS + Kerberos. Does such configuration can handle the task ? I mean on a

<    1   2   3