On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 04:48:23AM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Don't blame the missing man page on the GNU.
It is being built, but it is not being installed.
Index: gnu/usr.bin/binutils/Makefile.bsd-wrapper
===
RCS file:
On 3/18/07, Woodchuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to know which symbols are defined in a shareable
object library, say libfoo.so.1.0.
I think readelf might be what you want.
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Woodchuck wrote:
I would like to know which symbols are defined in a shareable
object library, say libfoo.so.1.0.
False alarm! The lib had been stripped during installation. Port
maintainer has been notified.
nm will give a useful symbol table on an unstripped
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Rafael Almeida wrote:
On 3/18/07, Woodchuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to know which symbols are defined in a shareable
object library, say libfoo.so.1.0.
I think readelf might be what you want.
Yeah, that will dump out some useful stuff.
Actually the
On 3/18/07, Woodchuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to know which symbols are defined in a shareable
object library, say libfoo.so.1.0.
If this were an old-style library (i.e. an archive), say libfoo.a,
I would use nm.
Surely there is a tool for doing this with the .so's. What is it?
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 09:30:23PM -0400, Woodchuck wrote:
I would like to know which symbols are defined in a shareable
object library, say libfoo.so.1.0.
If this were an old-style library (i.e. an archive), say libfoo.a,
I would use nm.
Surely there is a tool for doing this with the
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Philip Guenther wrote:
On 3/18/07, Woodchuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to know which symbols are defined in a shareable
object library, say libfoo.so.1.0.
If this were an old-style library (i.e. an archive), say libfoo.a,
I would use nm.
Surely
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 10:04:18PM -0400, Woodchuck wrote:
Actually the problem is that the .so was from a port, and
the library had been installed stripped. On an unstripped .so,
nm works fine.
It works fine on a stripped .so too.
Will a stripped .so even work as a library for ld?
Yes.
Woodchuck wrote on Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 10:10:46PM -0400:
Hadn't noticed that readelf thing before. No man page.
You seem to have a point.
Hmmm. Smells gnuish...
Don't blame the missing man page on the GNU.
It is being built, but it is not being installed.
Index:
9 matches
Mail list logo