Seems like a small tax on people who
don't keep decent backups.
Yeah, thats thats me.
Thank you all so much for the links.
vladas
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 08:56:55PM +0900, vladas wrote:
Hi all.
I have fd up the first 10Mb of the 3Gb fat disk
(not partition, the whole 3Gb disk) full of windoze
shit. Then, due to time limits, made some of sort
of backup of the mess with dd and put Puffy into
that disk (dedicated
On 07/07/06, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 08:56:55PM +0900, vladas wrote:
Hi all.
I have fd up the first 10Mb of the 3Gb fat disk
(not partition, the whole 3Gb disk) full of windoze
shit. Then, due to time limits, made some of sort
of backup of the
vladas wrote:
Thank you for all these good ideas.
I will check them out.
vladas
Foremost might help too. It find for file headers/footers. Don't know if
it will help on a very fragmented FAT, but it worked for me on an ext3
partition, where i deleted some files. The only problem is that it
On 7/6/06, vladas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have fd up the first 10Mb of the 3Gb fat disk
(not partition, the whole 3Gb disk) full of windoze
shit. Then, due to time limits, made some of sort
of backup of the mess with dd and put Puffy into
that disk (dedicated install). The problem is that
if there was only one partion with FAT, you#re out
of luck with any standard tool because the
fat is within the first 10 mb.
the are tools out there (google something like 'file
recovery FAT'), but I don't know whether such exist for
OpenBSD: In any case, the more fragmented the
FAT was, the
vladas wrote:
due to the first 10Mb being gone, I do not expect to find any valid fs
anymore. What I still hope for are individual files from the 3Gb image
file that I have. I mean e.g. exe's, or dll's, zip's, lha's etc should have
their size written in them or their data structures, not only
vladas 6-Jul-06 13:46
Thank you for your replies. I was not clear enough in the first place:
due to the first 10Mb being gone, I do not expect to find any valid fs
anymore. What I still hope for are individual files from the 3Gb image
file that I have. I mean e.g. exe's, or dll's, zip's,
On 6 July 2006, vladas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I was not clear enough in the first place: due to the first 10Mb being
gone, I do not expect to find any valid fs anymore. What I still hope
for are individual files from the 3Gb image file that I have. I mean
e.g. exe's, or dll's, zip's,
Thank you all for your really informative replies.
Hello Vladas,
On 2006.07.06, at 9:56 PM, vladas wrote:
I have fd up the first 10Mb of the 3Gb fat disk
(not partition, the whole 3Gb disk) full of windoze
shit. Then, due to time limits, made some of sort
of backup of the mess with dd and put Puffy into
that disk (dedicated install). The
On 7/6/06, Shane J Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Vladas,
On 2006.07.06, at 9:56 PM, vladas wrote:
I have fd up the first 10Mb of the 3Gb fat disk
(not partition, the whole 3Gb disk) full of windoze
shit. Then, due to time limits, made some of sort
of backup of the mess with dd
Hi Nick,
On 2006.07.07, at 2:51 PM, Nick Guenther wrote:
I've used R-Studio and it works quite well (and quickly so long as you
keep your computer out of screensavers and things). It's somewhat
expensive at 100$. It works by just scanning the disk for signatures
of files, and is usually able
13 matches
Mail list logo
