Re: libc.so.39.3

2008-02-23 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
It would be in the base.tgz in release 3.9 You may have upgraded and an old binary may be linked against the old version. Try making a symlink. On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 14:07 -0500, Jay Hart wrote: On base OpenBSD 4.2. What package should I install to get the above library? Thanks, Jay

Re: libc.so.39.3

2008-02-23 Thread Josh Grosse
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 02:07:58PM -0500, Jay Hart wrote: On base OpenBSD 4.2. What package should I install to get the above library? Thanks, Jay 1. It's not a package, libc is in the baseNN.tgz fileset. 39.3 is the fileset for OpenBSD 4.0. You are obviously attempting to use an

Re: libc.so.39.3

2008-02-23 Thread Theo de Raadt
It would be in the base.tgz in release 3.9 You may have upgraded and an old binary may be linked against the old version. Try making a symlink. No, do not make a symbolic link. There are a variety of reasons why library numbers get cranked, and most of them relate to stopping very subtle

Re: libc.so.39.3

2008-02-23 Thread Antti Harri
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 14:07 -0500, Jay Hart wrote: On base OpenBSD 4.2. What package should I install to get the above library? On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: It would be in the base.tgz in release 3.9 No, it's in 4.0 unless I'm mistaken.

Re: libc.so.39.3

2008-02-23 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 12:30 -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote: No, do not make a symbolic link. Right, for the record and mail archives, a symlink would only be a temp solution and is not guaranteed (likely even) to solve the problem. Obviously, Jay is not working on in a production environment,

Re: libc.so.39.3

2008-02-23 Thread Jay Hart
thanks for the hands-up. For right now I've made the sym link while I get the box production ready. I intend to install latest version of the app (APCUPSD) on the box, once I get all the patches applied, and my environment settled. Speaking of patches, I see that there is some problem trying to