Re: [l...@ecentrum.hu: Re: ls(1) multibyte support]

2012-03-23 Thread LEVAI Daniel
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:24:28 +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:18:43AM +0100, Peter Hessler wrote: from what I can tell, the problems blocking this diff from going in have been fixed, and it looks good to me. [...] For now, if you really require multi-byte

Re: ls(1) multibyte support

2012-03-22 Thread LEVAI Daniel
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 09:14:51PM +0300, Alexander Polakov wrote: Hi, I wonder if there any plans on adding multibyte support for ls(1)? Or maybe there's a reason why it's not a great idea (which I am not aware of)? Anyway, here's a patch I have. It's based on DragonFlyBSD's ls.

Re: [l...@ecentrum.hu: Re: ls(1) multibyte support]

2012-03-22 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:18:43AM +0100, Peter Hessler wrote: from what I can tell, the problems blocking this diff from going in have been fixed, and it looks good to me. (Putting misc@ on Cc so that everyone interested gets this information.) There is more to this than the wcwidth() bug