On 1 January 2008, Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vijay Sankar mrta:
[...]
there's support in 2.4 but iirc it's not a simple thing to
backport.
Why should we backport the db4.6 support? We just need to use 2.4.
[...]
(1) Historically, upgrading existing OpenLDAP databases to new formats
On December 31, 2007 06:59:06 am Vijay Sankar wrote:
On December 30, 2007 08:03:09 pm Stuart Henderson wrote:
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
the bdb
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:13:26 -0600
Vijay Sankar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On December 31, 2007 06:59:06 am Vijay Sankar wrote:
env CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include/db4 -I/usr/local/include/sasl \
LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib/db4 -L/usr/local/share/libtool/libltdl
-L/usr/local/lib/sasl2
Vijay Sankar mrta:
On December 30, 2007 08:03:09 pm Stuart Henderson wrote:
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
the bdb backed? I'm using -current ports tree, and built the
On 2008/01/01 13:27, Daniel wrote:
there's support in 2.4 but iirc it's not a simple thing to backport.
Why should we backport the db4.6 support? We just need to use 2.4.
Well, you mentioned one reason why not just upgrade:
With openldap-2.4, one can not use the ldbm backend anymore, but
On December 30, 2007 08:03:09 pm Stuart Henderson wrote:
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
the bdb backed? I'm using -current ports tree, and built the
Quoting Vijay Sankar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On December 30, 2007 08:03:09 pm Stuart Henderson wrote:
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
the bdb backed? I'm using
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:49:20 -0600
Vijay Sankar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On December 29, 2007 02:15:15 pm Daniel wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:41:06 -0600
Vijay Sankar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
the bdb backed? I'm using -current ports tree, and built the
openldap-{client,server}, dbv4 and cyrus-sasl2 packages from
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using the bdb
backed? I'm using -current ports tree, and built the
openldap-{client,server}, dbv4 and cyrus-sasl2 packages from there.
I will
On December 29, 2007 02:15:15 pm Daniel wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:41:06 -0600
Vijay Sankar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
the bdb
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:41:06 -0600
Vijay Sankar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
the bdb backed? I'm using -current ports tree, and built the
12 matches
Mail list logo
