Re: route add -interface

2009-05-17 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 01:13:29AM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: Hi misc, route add allows one to specify a directly-connected route reachable over an interface, using the -interface switch. However, I can't seem to figure out if it's possible to specify just the interface name to the

Re: route add -interface

2009-05-17 Thread Felipe Alfaro Solana
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.comwrote: On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 01:13:29AM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: Hi misc, route add allows one to specify a directly-connected route reachable over an interface, using the -interface switch. However, I

Re: route add -interface

2009-05-17 Thread Felipe Alfaro Solana
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Felipe Alfaro Solana felipe.alf...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.comwrote: On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 01:13:29AM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: Hi misc, route add allows one to specify a

Re: route add -interface

2009-05-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009-05-17, Felipe Alfaro Solana felipe.alf...@gmail.com wrote: The problem with incorrectly-sourced IP datagrams seems to be NAT: nat on vr2 inet from 172.16.0.1/24 to any - (vr2) round-robin This rule is created as: nat on $ext_if from $int_if:network to any - ($ext_if) I understand

Re: route add -interface

2009-05-17 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 01:38:07PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2009-05-17, Felipe Alfaro Solana felipe.alf...@gmail.com wrote: The problem with incorrectly-sourced IP datagrams seems to be NAT: nat on vr2 inet from 172.16.0.1/24 to any - (vr2) round-robin This rule is created

Re: route add -interface

2009-05-17 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:39:43AM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.comwrote: On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 01:13:29AM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: Hi misc, route add allows one to specify a directly-connected route

Re: route add -interface

2009-05-17 Thread Felipe Alfaro Solana
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.orgwrote: On 2009-05-17, Felipe Alfaro Solana felipe.alf...@gmail.com wrote: The problem with incorrectly-sourced IP datagrams seems to be NAT: nat on vr2 inet from 172.16.0.1/24 to any - (vr2) round-robin This rule

Re: route add -interface

2009-05-17 Thread Felipe Alfaro Solana
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.comwrote: On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 01:38:07PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2009-05-17, Felipe Alfaro Solana felipe.alf...@gmail.com wrote: The problem with incorrectly-sourced IP datagrams seems to be NAT: nat

Re: route add -interface

2009-05-17 Thread Felipe Alfaro Solana
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.comwrote: On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:39:43AM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com wrote: On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 01:13:29AM +0200, Felipe Alfaro