Re: trivial smtpd scheduler diff

2012-07-17 Thread Gilles Chehade
mh, is it really that verbose ? Gilles On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 06:54:41PM +0100, percy piper wrote: Any objections to making the scheduler a little less verbose? Cheers, Percy. Index: scheduler.c === RCS file:

Re: trivial smtpd scheduler diff

2012-07-17 Thread percy piper
I'd say twice per message processed is unnecessarily verbose but I assume you want it that way for a reason. It is a trivial niggle and probably irritates only me :-) Thanks for looking Gilles. Percy. On 17 July 2012 19:04, Gilles Chehade gil...@poolp.org wrote: mh, is it really that verbose

Re: trivial smtpd scheduler diff

2012-07-17 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 07:32:38PM +0100, percy piper wrote: I'd say twice per message processed is unnecessarily verbose but I assume you want it that way for a reason. ok that's too verbose indeed. It is a trivial niggle and probably irritates only me :-) no i can understand, i