Re: what's makes a route not valid in openbgpd?

2007-10-29 Thread Aaron Glenn
On 10/29/07, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The nexthop depends on a bgp route which is considered evil and therefor not allowed by default. Add nexthop qualify via bgp to the global config part and your setup should work again. Henning hit me with that clue-by-four privately, and

Re: what's makes a route not valid in openbgpd?

2007-10-29 Thread Henning Brauer
* Aaron Glenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-29 23:33]: On 10/29/07, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The nexthop depends on a bgp route which is considered evil and therefor not allowed by default. Add nexthop qualify via bgp to the global config part and your setup should work again.

Re: what's makes a route not valid in openbgpd?

2007-10-29 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 01:40:07PM -0700, Aaron Glenn wrote: running 4.2/i386 as of two weeks ago, I've got a default route that isn't being seen as valid and consequently not installed in the RIB. when I first rolled this router out, however, it was valid and being installed. while I'm

Re: what's makes a route not valid in openbgpd?

2007-10-29 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 03:32:59PM -0700, Aaron Glenn wrote: On 10/29/07, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The nexthop depends on a bgp route which is considered evil and therefor not allowed by default. Add nexthop qualify via bgp to the global config part and your setup should