Re: Regarding the default /usr partitioning

2015-07-03 Thread Joel Rees
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Carlos Fenollosa wrote: > Hi, > > I’m a new OpenBSD user, so please forgive me if this topic has been discussed > thoroughly already. > > I installed a new box using the default partitioning (2GB for /usr) and I > found that it’s a bit insufficient since /usr/por

Re: Regarding the default /usr partitioning

2015-06-30 Thread lists
> everyone has different needs of course, but in my 15+ > years of openbsd usage both on desktop and servers i > needed to build ports exactly hand, give or take> times. Same experience my end too with OpenBSD. I have had a couple very rare occasions in a long time that something may have needed

Re: Regarding the default /usr partitioning

2015-06-29 Thread frantisek holop
Carlos Fenollosa, 29 Jun 2015 15:24: > Hi Tim, this is true. However, at some point, even > novice users might need to build a port to apply some > errata. If that port is one of the big ones (php, in > my case), they may realize that they don’t have > enough disk space. everyone has different ne

Re: Regarding the default /usr partitioning

2015-06-29 Thread lists
> However, at some point, even novice users might need to build a port to apply > some errata. For novice users the documentation recommends using packages mainly. > If that port is one of the big ones (php, in my case), they may > realize that they don’t have enough disk space. > Granted, there

Re: Regarding the default /usr partitioning

2015-06-29 Thread Carlos Fenollosa
> Novice users are strongly encouraged to use packages and not to build > ports. Learn the system first, then you can play around with ports and > disk partitioning, etc. > > Sounds like a pain in the butt, but BSD is great in that there is a > relativly strong seperation of system vs user files

Re: Regarding the default /usr partitioning

2015-06-29 Thread trondd
On Mon, June 29, 2015 4:05 am, Carlos Fenollosa wrote: > For a novice user, theyâ**re going to be constrained with the current > defaults when they want to compile some big port â** thatâ**s my case, I > canâ**t build php-5.6 because of disk space, and Iâ**ve run â**make > cleanâ** on all subfolder

Re: Regarding the default /usr partitioning

2015-06-29 Thread Chris Bennett
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:05:59AM +0200, Carlos Fenollosa wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for all the information. I had read disklabel(8) and my indication of > /usr/src was actually my mistake, it has indeed its own partition. Sorry for > that. > > My disk has 80 GB so it falls under the >7GB pa

Re: Regarding the default /usr partitioning

2015-06-29 Thread Carlos Fenollosa
Hi all, Thanks for all the information. I had read disklabel(8) and my indication of /usr/src was actually my mistake, it has indeed its own partition. Sorry for that. My disk has 80 GB so it falls under the >7GB partitioning. Regarding the fact that the installer is flexible, I know, I was on

Re: Regarding the default /usr partitioning

2015-06-28 Thread James Hartley
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Chris Bennett < chrisbenn...@bennettconstruction.us> wrote: > Why only up to p? It is a historical limitation. > Could this be easily changed... No, it would break a number of things. > ...or would that be a major project? Yes. > I would really like to

Re: Regarding the default /usr partitioning

2015-06-28 Thread Chris Bennett
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 05:59:09PM -0500, James Hartley wrote: > On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Carlos Fenollosa < > carlos.fenoll...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I installed a new box using the default partitioning (2GB for /usr) and I > > found that it???s a bit insufficient since /usr/ports, /

Re: Regarding the default /usr partitioning

2015-06-28 Thread James Hartley
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Carlos Fenollosa < carlos.fenoll...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I installed a new box using the default partitioning (2GB for /usr) and I > found that it’s a bit insufficient since /usr/ports, /usr/xenocara and > /usr/src hang from there on the same partition, and eat

Re: Regarding the default /usr partitioning

2015-06-28 Thread Alexander Salmin
Hi, Read up on the Automatic disk allocation chapter in the disklabel manual as mentioned by Raf. Basically partitions are dynamically allocated based on total disk-space with a few exceptions - the following paths have their own partitions on disks larger than 7G (so you are mistaken about t

Re: Regarding the default /usr partitioning

2015-06-28 Thread Raf Czlonka
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 11:15:20PM BST, Carlos Fenollosa wrote: > Hi, Hi Carlos, > I’m a new OpenBSD user, so please forgive me if this topic has been > discussed thoroughly already. > > I installed a new box using the default partitioning (2GB for > /usr) and I found that it’s a bit insufficien

Regarding the default /usr partitioning

2015-06-28 Thread Carlos Fenollosa
Hi, I’m a new OpenBSD user, so please forgive me if this topic has been discussed thoroughly already. I installed a new box using the default partitioning (2GB for /usr) and I found that it’s a bit insufficient since /usr/ports, /usr/xenocara and /usr/src hang from there on the same partition,