On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 03:30:14PM +0100, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:55:51 +0100
> Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> > > > Wow that's a strange flag combo. Why is S & M set together?
> > > > Hmm. Another strange routing thing I need to have a loot at.
> > > > Most probably the cloning
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:55:51 +0100
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > Wow that's a strange flag combo. Why is S & M set together?
> > > Hmm. Another strange routing thing I need to have a loot at.
> > > Most probably the cloning is done wrong.
> >
> > Hmm, does it have to be cloned? Couldn't this be the
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:54:43AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2010-03-12, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:28:33AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> On 2010-03-10, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> >> > Hi misc,
> >> > I got a 4.5 box which act as a perimeter ipsec routing
On 2010-03-12, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:28:33AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2010-03-10, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
>> > Hi misc,
>> > I got a 4.5 box which act as a perimeter ipsec routing gateway, it
>> > has 682 flow (by ipsecctl -sf | wc -l).
>> >
>> > Some of
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:43:39 +0100
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:28:33AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2010-03-10, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> > > Hi misc,
> > > I got a 4.5 box which act as a perimeter ipsec routing gateway,
> > > it has 682 flow (by ipsecctl -sf | wc
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 01:43:39AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
| On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:28:33AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
| > On 2010-03-10, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
| > > Hi misc,
| > > I got a 4.5 box which act as a perimeter ipsec routing gateway, it
| > > has 682 flow (by ipsecctl -
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:28:33AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2010-03-10, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> > Hi misc,
> > I got a 4.5 box which act as a perimeter ipsec routing gateway, it
> > has 682 flow (by ipsecctl -sf | wc -l).
> >
> > Some of this flow are up with a static route to the
On 2010-03-10, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> Hi misc,
> I got a 4.5 box which act as a perimeter ipsec routing gateway, it
> has 682 flow (by ipsecctl -sf | wc -l).
>
> Some of this flow are up with a static route to the other point of the
> ipsec tunnel and some of these routes are changing dynami
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:44:36 +0100
Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> Any hints is really appreciated.
Should I stop accepting icmp redirect with the sysctl knobs as the
changes in the 4.6 release?
Cheers
--
Massimo
Hi misc,
I got a 4.5 box which act as a perimeter ipsec routing gateway, it
has 682 flow (by ipsecctl -sf | wc -l).
Some of this flow are up with a static route to the other point of the
ipsec tunnel and some of these routes are changing dynamically (netstat
shows UGHMS flags).
When these rou
10 matches
Mail list logo
