Re: SHA256 mismatch on base46.tgz in 20 Jan i386 snapshot

2010-01-23 Thread Nick Holland
Julian Leyh wrote: > Am 23.01.10 07:05, schrieb James Hartley: >> A quick search in the misc@ archives& PR database didn't reveal that anyone >> has mentioned this before. >> >> In installing the 20 January (#511) i386 snapshot, I received a SHA256 >> mismatch on base46.tgz. Otherwise, the snapsh

Re: SHA256 mismatch on base46.tgz in 20 Jan i386 snapshot

2010-01-23 Thread Pieter Verberne
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:05:13PM -0800, James Hartley wrote: > A quick search in the misc@ archives & PR database didn't reveal that anyone > has mentioned this before. > > In installing the 20 January (#511) i386 snapshot, I received a SHA256 > mismatch on base46.tgz. Otherwise, the snapshot i

Re: SHA256 mismatch on base46.tgz in 20 Jan i386 snapshot

2010-01-23 Thread Julian Leyh
Am 23.01.10 07:05, schrieb James Hartley: A quick search in the misc@ archives& PR database didn't reveal that anyone has mentioned this before. In installing the 20 January (#511) i386 snapshot, I received a SHA256 mismatch on base46.tgz. Otherwise, the snapshot installs as expected. Why ch

Re: SHA256 mismatch on base46.tgz in 20 Jan i386 snapshot

2010-01-22 Thread Aaron Stellman
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:05:13PM -0800, James Hartley wrote: > A quick search in the misc@ archives & PR database didn't reveal that anyone > has mentioned this before. > > In installing the 20 January (#511) i386 snapshot, I received a SHA256 > mismatch on base46.tgz. Otherwise, the snapshot i

SHA256 mismatch on base46.tgz in 20 Jan i386 snapshot

2010-01-22 Thread James Hartley
A quick search in the misc@ archives & PR database didn't reveal that anyone has mentioned this before. In installing the 20 January (#511) i386 snapshot, I received a SHA256 mismatch on base46.tgz. Otherwise, the snapshot installs as expected. FYI & FWIW. Jim