On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 06:24:33AM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
Erling Westenvik [erling.westen...@gmail.com] wrote:
physical disks:
sd0a: 64 + N-64
sd1a: 64 + N-64
RAID 1 volume:
sd2a: 64 + 64 + N-128
CRYPTO volume:
sd3a: 64 + 64 + 64 + N-196
The space wasted on
Erling Westenvik [erling.westen...@gmail.com] wrote:
physical disks:
sd0a: 64 + N-64
sd1a: 64 + N-64
RAID 1 volume:
sd2a: 64 + 64 + N-128
CRYPTO volume:
sd3a: 64 + 64 + 64 + N-196
The space wasted on large disks is negligible but I would really like to
know at which level the
Fri 2.Aug'13 at 18:07:17 +0200, Erling
Westenvik
Not sure how to express myself here, but consider preparing a physical
disk (sd0) for FDE. We initialize the disk:
# fdisk -iy sd0
# printf a\n\n\n\nRAID\nw\nq\n\n | disklabel -E sd0
# bioctl -c C -l
On 08/02/13 12:06, Erling Westenvik wrote:
...
The space wasted on large disks is negligible but I would really like to
know at which level the 64 sector offset may be set to 0.
yes. two offsets, 128 sectors * 0.5k/sector = 64k.
Now, I probably appreciate the value of 64k more than most
Not sure how to express myself here, but consider preparing a physical
disk (sd0) for FDE. We initialize the disk:
# fdisk -iy sd0
# printf a\n\n\n\nRAID\nw\nq\n\n | disklabel -E sd0
# bioctl -c C -l /dev/sd0a softraid0
This yields a virtual disk sd1 with an a partition of type RAID that
has an
5 matches
Mail list logo