On 11/10/07, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
of philosophy. Linux is about making all kinds of toys work in a
hot-plug way and allow people to boast about their uptime. OpenBSD is
about security.
I would add usability (conciseness, least surprise and coherency) and
thus
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 05:52:03PM +0100, knitti wrote:
On 11/10/07, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
of philosophy. Linux is about making all kinds of toys work in a
hot-plug way and allow people to boast about their uptime. OpenBSD is
about security.
I would add usability
for itself and has a strong history of
security. IMO, OpenBSD doesn't need to be 'sold' as as security solution as
it sells itself, but others feel differently.
Many thanks to any who can offer advice,
Brad
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Security-Comparisons-tf4779123
On Nov 9, 2007 10:53 AM, new_guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this is off-topic, I apologize. Just tell me and I'll go away ;)
I'm having discussions with a coworkers about moving to OpenBSD for
Apache/PHP web hosting. Right now, we use various Linux distros. I have no
problem with that. Linux
. Comparing OpenBSD 3.x (85 Advisories) to Debian 3.x (577).
http://secunia.com/product/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Security-Comparisons-tf4779123.html#a13676309
Sent from the openbsd user - misc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 02:27:16PM -0800, new_guy wrote:
Darren Spruell wrote:
Sadly, justifying the obvious through these means is often a requirement.
Here's an approach you might consider. Take a best practice /
standards guide such as from NIST:
6 matches
Mail list logo
